Quantcast
Channel: VISUP
Viewing all 332 articles
Browse latest View live

Philosophical Minds Musings

$
0
0


Another week, another podcast. Actually, this one was conducted last week, but I'm just now getting around to publishing it. I do believe that I've now participated in more podcasts in 2019 than in the previous eight years in which I've published this blog combined. And I should have at least one or two more interviews published before the year concludes. It kind of blows the mind, though I am most grateful for having the opportunity to present my research in this other medium with increasing frequency.

This week I'm being interviewed by Skyler of Philosophical Minds, another new podcast. Unfortunately, we were a little pressed for time due to miscommunications on my part, but we still managed to cover a wide range of topics in the 45 minutes or so that we had. They included: Las Vegas, New Mexico, and all of the black research that goes on in this region of the country; the legendary (or infamous, depending upon one's point of view) Special Operations Executive (SOE) and its role in relation to the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) and MI6; the relationship, or lack therefore of, between Projects BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKEMK-ULTRA, and OFTEN; the credibility of Gordon Thomas' research; the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) and the possible influence the SOE had over it; the different missions of JSOC and the Green Berets and the contrasts between "unconventional warfare" and counterinsurgency; the Vatican's hierarchy; and of course, the Sovereign Military Order of Malta (SMOM), Opus Dei, and the Legionaries of Christ, and the rivalry these reactionary Catholic orders have with the Jesuits. The Templars and their possible ties to Freemasonry are also addressed very briefly. There's probably a host of other topics addressed I'm forgetting as well. Like I said, not a bad haul for about 45 minutes.

The podcast can be found here.

More information on the various CIA "behavioral modification" programs can be found here.

More on the SOE can be found here and here.

More on the rivalry between SMOM/Opus Dei and the Jesuits can be found here.

And finally, more on the rise of JSOC can be found here.

As always dear readers, I hope that everyone enjoys the interview. And a big thank you to all of the podcasts that have graciously had me on as a guest this year. It certainly has been a long, strange trip, but also an immensely rewarding one. And with that, I shall sign off for now. Until next time, stay tuned.



Secret Armies and the Origins of the Cerle Complex Part VII

$
0
0


Welcome to the seventh installment in my long neglected examination into the origins of a mysterious outfit variously known as Le Cercle, the Pinay Group, the Pesenti Group and a host of other titles. Often described as simply a "foreign policy think tank," the Cercle complex was also a vast private intelligence network that wielded tremendous power throughout the Cold War. Much more information on these activities can be found in an earlier series I wrote on the Cercle complex.

The complex still appears to be a major power to this day, especially for British Tories, as was recently explored here. However, this series is about the origins of the complex, and those lie in mainland Europe. Founded in the period between 1952-53, the complex began as an offshoot of the infamous Bilderberg group and geared towards Franco-German rapprochement. However, Le Cercle always had a more reactionary and Catholic flavor than their counterparts in Bilderberg. Virtually all of the founding members belonged to either the Sovereign Military Order of Malta or Opus Dei. As the years went on, the differences Bilderberg and the Cercle became more pronounced and this led to a partial break between the two outfits by the 1970s.

But even prior to the official founding of Le Cercle, its genesis can be found in the "secret armies" or stay-behind networks that were founded by the US and UK throughout Europe in the immediate aftermath of WWII. In theory, these networks would be activated in the event of a Soviet invasion and wage "unconventional warfare" against the invaders. The inspiration for this project came from the stay-behind networks employed by the American Office of Strategic Services and British Special Operations Executive (SOE) on the one side, and Amt VI-S of the Reich Main Security Office (RSHA) on the other. These agencies were explored in the first installment of this series. Elsewhere, part two considered how assets of these agencies were transferred to the private sector in the aftermath of WWII. Part three principally dealt with the World Commerce Corporation (WCC), the shadowy, intelligence-riddled conglomerate that came to control many of these assets at the onset of the Cold War.

OSS founder and director William Donovan presenting an award to British Security Co-ordination (BSC) chief William Stephenson. After working closely together during WWII, both men would go on to become directors of the WCC in the postwar years.
The fourth and sixth installments dealt with the origins of several of the most notorious stay-behind networks in Western Europe and how virtually all of these networks were controlled by crucial figures within the Cercle. The fifth installment principally focused on the French Paix et Liberté and how psychological warfare was also a component of these stay-behind networks.

While all of the prior installments provide compelling details concerning the origins of the Cercle complex, to get to the heart of the matter the French stay-behind efforts must be further explored. Le Cercle was, after all, principally a French initiative in the early years and while parts four and five do spent a lot of time on French stay-behind efforts, these are accounts are from the Cold War era.

The true origins of the Cercle appear to reside in French interwar stay-behind efforts, especially those relating to the infamous Comité secret d'action révolutionnaire, more commonly referred to as simply "La Cagoule" (The Hood). The Cagoulards would be active in stay-behind efforts in the interwar years, WWII, and in the postwar efforts as well. What's more, they appear to have played a role in establishing Le Cercle and, in general, wielded tremendous power in France throughout the Cold War.

As such, numerous conspiracy theories concerning this group have emerged over the years. Thus, in order to understand the group, we most also determine what claims leveled against it are legitimate and which are not. With that in mind, this installment shall presently focus on the established facts of the interwar Cagoule. The next installment will deal with some of the more speculative accounts of the organization, while part nine will delve into the WWII and Cold War Cagoule and hopefully tie everything together. With that in mind, on to the Cagoule.


The Reality of the Prewar Cagoule


France, like much of Europe, experienced turbulent times throughout the 1930s. In early 1934, the French had elected a center-left coalition headed by Prime Minister Édouard Daladier. His government lasted just a little over a week. The government was riddled with scandal from the Stavisky Affair and this spurred the far right to take to the streets. Roughly twenty right wing leagues staged demonstrations on February 6 that soon escalated to bloody rioting. Daladier's government soon collapsed and a center-right coalition emerged in its ashes.

Daladier
Of these right wing leagues, the most prominent was Action Francaise. Founded in 1898, the movement was highly conservative and staunchly pro-royalist as well as Catholic and anti-democratic to the core. It was also viewed by a rising generation of far right activists as hopelessly timid. Spurred on by the successful rioting, they hoped for an even more militant approach. Instead, Action Francaise expelled many of these extremists by the 1935.


In 1936, French voters rallied behind the Popular Front, a left-wing political coalition comprised of Socialists, Communists, and "Radicals." This brought to power Leon Blum, who was both a socialist and a Jew. As should come as little surprise, the Right was absolutely beside itself. For many of the militant Action Francaise members who had been drummed out during the prior year, Blum's election was definitive proof of the failure of the more moderate line employed by the traditional conservatives during the 1930s. The time for action was now upon them.

At the forefront of this drive for action was the enigmatic figure of Eugene Deloncle, a successful naval engineer and World War I veteran. After briefly toying with a legitimate political organization in early 1936, he and several other disgruntled Action Francaise militants founded a secret organization known as Comité secret d'action révolutionnaire (CSAR) some time between the summer and fall of that fateful year.

Of course, France was awash with militant right wing organizations by 1936 despite government efforts to ban such leagues. What distinguished the Cagoulards were their high level contacts and excessive funding. Deloncle and many of his co-conspirators were solidly upper middle class professionals and as such, had easy access to wealthy capitalist and the French armed forces, both of whom showed an almost immediate interest in the Cagoulards.
"The Cagoule received significant funding from major France industrial leaders who appreciated its antisocialist agenda, especially from the group associate with Banque Worms. It never achieved the full support of the army that Deloncle craved; nonetheless, it did recruit a number of retired military officers into its leadership ranks and received the quiet approval of many active military leaders, probably even Marshall Philippe Petain. Petain seems to have known about the existence of the Cagoule and used it as a means of maintaining unofficial contact with members of the extreme right and keeping himself apprised of their activities, as did Marshall Louis Franchet d'Esperey, who also provided the organization with significant funding. Between May and November 1936 Franchet d'Esperey sent one of his staff, Colonel Georges Groussard, to investigate the CSAR; this led to at least fifteen meetings with the group's leading members, including Deloncle. Then, in December 1936, a member of Petain's staff, Commandant Georges Loustaunau-Lacau, founded a network known as the Corvignolles, which sought information on communist activity in the army. In March 1937, Franchet d'Esperey facilitated several meetings between Loustaunau-Lacau and Deloncle and probably Groussard as well. These contacts ultimately allowed the Cagoule to feed information to the army intelligence service inside the Deuxieme Bureau of the General Staff, one of two branches of the French army in charge of gathering intelligence, about real or imagined communist conspiracies. Deloncle seems to have left these meetings with the idea that in the event of an uprising, his Cagoulard street fighters would wage war alongside the regular French military."
(Murder in the Metro, Gayle K. Brunelle & Annette Finley-Croswhite, pgs. 102-103)
Deloncle
Do keep the Banque Worms, and the two Georges', Groussard and Loustaunau-Lacau, in mind as well shall return to all three again before this series is finished. For now, it is worth noting the similarity of the Cagoule and the latter, Cold War-era stay-behind networks. Deloncle and many of the senior Cagoulards were veterans while the organization received early support from the French military. Indeed, it would seem that Petain and company viewed the Cagoule as a potential auxiliary to the French military in the event of a communist uprising. This was very similar to the alleged purpose of the Cold War-era stay-behind networks, which would be used to wage a guerrilla war against Soviet invaders in conjunction with US and UK special operations forces. But like the Cold War-era stay-behinds, the Cagoule were ultimately more concerned with destabilizing the French state than putting down a communist uprising which, like the latter threats of a Soviet invasion, never materialized.

But before delving into the misdeeds of the Cagoualrds, I would like to consider their foreign intelligence contacts as well. They maintained excellent contacts with Franco's forces, whom they were major arms suppliers of (more on that in a moment), but had even closer ties to the Italians.
"For their part, the Italians were only too happy to cultivate Deloncle and his organization, as long as it didn't cost them too much; but they seem to have had doubts about the ability of the Cagoule to effect regime change in France. Filipppo Anfuso, a midlevel official in Mussolini's government, was charged with the task of maintaining the relationship between the Cagoule and the Organizzazione per la Vigilanza e la Repressione dell'antifascismo or Organization for Vigilance and Repression of Anti-Fascism (OVRA), Mussolini secret service... In late 1936, Anfuso received a visit from Lieutenant Colonel Santo Emanuele, the head of the Italian counter-espionage service, Emanuele informed Anfuso that he was in contact with an officer in the French deuxieme bureau who in turn was a liaison with a French political group comprised of wealthy individuals. These men were pro-Mussolini and anti-Popular Front in their political sentiments. Anfuso informed his superior, count Gian Galeazzo Ciano, of these developments. Ciano, after participating in the Italian invasion of Ethiopia, became Mussolini's foreign minister in 1936. He was also Mussolini's son-in-law. Ciano, after consultation with Mussolini, instructed Anfuso to get as much further information about this French group as possible, which Anfuso proceeded to do, meeting an emissary of the Cagoule in Turin in the spring of 1937. The meeting was held in the office of the head of counter-espionage in Turin, Commandant Roberto Navale, a military intelligence officer. Emanuele, who was present at the meeting, later stated that the French representative was Francois Metenier. In his testimony to the juge d'instruction overseeing the case against the Cagoule, Metenier claim that he had been working secretly for the deuxieme bureau at the time, both carrying out missions in Spain, where he made contact with officers loyal to Franco, and working alongside the Spanish and Italian frontiers with France. He denied that his work was in any way related to the Cagoule. Anfuso subsequently reported verbally to Ciano and in writing to Mussolini about these discussions.
"A few months later, Anfuso had a second meeting with a member of the Cagoule, this time at San Remo. The intermediary again was Emanuele, but the Cagoulard was none other than Joseph Darnand, former colleague in Nice of Cagoule arms broker Juif and now head of the Cagoule there. Darnand turned over to Anfuso a letter of credit signed by Franchet d'Esperey. Anfuso had some doubts about the authenticity of the letter, although unnecessarily, as Franchet d'Esperey was a major supporter and financier of the Cagoule. Anfuso informed Mussolini about the results of the second meeting, and Mussolini showed a lively interest in the possibility of an alliance. Anfuso later claimed that his involvement in the affair ended at this point, although he subsequently learned that the Italian military did respond favorably to the Cagoule's request for weapons. The high-level support for the Cagoule among prominent French conservatives, along with ample funds they were willing to supply the Cagoule for weapons purchases, helped smooth the way for this rapprochement between Mussolini and the French fascists, an accord that reached its high point with Deloncle's trip to Rome in October 1936, when he met Il Duce himself and subsequently speculated on a Rome-Paris-Madrid alliance."
(Murder in the Metro, Gayle K. Brunelle & Annette Finley-Croswhite, pgs. 128-129)
The high level contacts the Cagoule enjoyed in both the French and Italian governments is a compelling indication that the secret network was being used as a back channel between the French far right and Mussolini. As Brunelle and Finley-Croswhite had indicated earlier in their work, many on the French far right at the time coveted an alliance between France, Fascist Italy, and the Spanish Nationalists. This would constitute a kind of Catholic/Fascist Latin League that would serve as a counterbalance between Anglo-American power on the one hand, and Nazi Germany on the other. Such a concept was appealing to Mussolini, who had become concerned about Italy becoming an outpost on Nazi Germany (which proved to be well founded). However, nothing was possible so long as Blum's Popular Front remained in power in France.

Il Duce
These events played out against the backdrop of the Spanish Civil War, which featured intrigues from virtually every major world power at the time. Indeed, the Spanish Civil War was arguably the opening salvo of what became the Second World War. Italy and Nazi Germany openly backed the Nationalists, even deploying "volunteer" legions to Spain to fight alongside Franco's forces. Elsewhere, the Soviet Union supported the Republicans. The US and UK officially supported non-intervention throughout the conflict, but many Americans and Britons volunteered to fight in the International Brigades on behalf of the Republicans.

It probably goes without saying, but the situation in France was quite complex in regards to the Spanish Civil War. Leon Blum was a staunch supporter of the Republican cause and had desperately wanted France to intervene on their behalf. However, he faced stiff opposition domestically from the French far right and internationally from the UK, where many British Tories quietly hoped the Nationalist would prevail. As such, Blum resorted to clandestine and technically illegal arms shipments to the Republicans.

Blum
Thus, while the official French government engaged in arms trafficking on behalf of the Republicans, the far right engaged in the same activity on behalf of the Nationalists. Naturally, the Cagoule were at the forefront of these efforts.
"Arms smuggling was a primary activity of the Cagoule, both in order to stockpile weapons for themselves and their followers in France and to raise funds by exporting weapons to Spain. Thus it is unsurprising that one of the charges the police leveled against the members of the Cagoule they indicted and/or arrested was arms trafficking. The police also uncovered numerous direct connections between the Cagoule and the Spanish Nationalist. The leaders of the Cagoule, when not purchasing arms from Belgium and Germany for their own use, were active in smuggling them to the Nationalists in Spain. Most of the money to acquire these weapons came from industrialists in France, who secretly hoped that the largely civilian Cagoule would be able to rally French defenses against the socialist and communist threat within France's own borders. Mussolini's government was also a source of funds for Cagoule arms purchases. The weapons themselves were often transported via Switzerland. In this respect, the Cagoule was tapping into an extensive network of overland arms smuggling via Switzerland that already existed, in which many weapons were funneled into France and through France to Spain. Many German weapons reached Franco's Nationalists by this itinerary, or by a sea route that originated in Belgium, went from there to England, and then on to Spanish or Portuguese seaports. By the same token, the Cagoule was able to import weapons from Spain, including ammunition for Mauser guns that have been manufactured in Toledo and other munitions, including machine guns, from San Sebastian. The Parisian police found some of the Spanish weapons stored in a hidden depot on the boulevard de Picpus."
(Murder in the Metro, Gayle K. Brunelle & Annette Finley-Croswhite, pgs. 125-126)
The amount of weapons stockpiled by the Cagoule in France in the span of less than two years was absolutely staggering. Brunelle and Finley-Croswhite describe it as "one of the most spectacular weapons collections in France --or anywhere else in Europe --outside of national armies..." (pg. 136). Elaborate underground depots to house the arms in were also constructed. Some of these underground facilities even featured prison cells, where communists and collaborators would theoretically be held once the revolution began. This should again emphasize the fact that the Cagoulards did not want for funding.

a Cagoule weapons cache confiscated by the police
However, there has been longstanding debate as to just how serious a threat to the French state that the Cagoule represented. Over the years, the right has gone to great lengths to depict them as a collection of bumbling amateurs that were hyped up by Blum and the Popular Front to cover up for their own poor government. And to be sure, while many of the senior members of the Cagoule were military veterans, the bulk of the organization had never served. And certainly no one appears to have had any kind of intelligence training either. As such, this led to numerous lapses in security as members, some of them even in Deloncle's inner circle, struggled to keep their mouths shut concerning the activities of the group.


The Cagoule's Reign of Terror

On the other hand, the Cagoule managed to wage quite an effective terror campaign during their brief existence. The group has been linked to several high profile assassinations, some of them carried out on behalf of foreign intelligence services. The most noteworthy was the assassination of the Rosselli brothers, Italian socialists who had developed into fierce critics of Mussolini's regime in exile. The Cagoule liquidated both in France on behalf of the Italian security services.

There is also compelling speculation that the Cagoulards were behind the murder of Dimitri Navachine, a former Russian communists who had broken with the Soviets and was an adviser to Blum at the time of his death. They have also been linked to the death of Laetitia Toureaux, the mistress of a leading Cagoulard and Italian spy who betrayed the designs of the OVRA (the Italian secret police) and the Cagoule to French authorities. Nor is Toureaux the only traitor the Cagoulards liquidated either. A pair of arms traffickers, Maurice Juif and Leon Jean-Baptiste, whom the Cagoule believed were misappropriating funds, were murdered by the organization in February 1937 and October 1936, respectively.

French police gathered round the body of Dimitri Navachine. The former communist is a curious figure whom we shall return to in the next installment.
The Cagoulards also proved to be effective agent provocateurs. A mass demonstration was held at Clichy in March of 1937 by both the far right and left. Cagoulards infiltrated the socialists and communists with chaos inevitably ensuing. Shots were fired by either the police or the Cagoule and a massive riot broke out that left five dead and three hundred and sixty four injured. The violence was generally blamed on the left and weakened Blum's government. He eventually resigned as prime minister in June of that year.

The Cagoule were hardly satisfied by Blum's ouster and the decline in support for the Popular Front, however. On September 11, 1937 (yes, 9/11), a pair of bombs were set off in Paris that left two police officers dead. They came to be known as the "Etoile attacks." The targets were the headquarters of two separate business associations. The selection was quite deliberate.
"... Indeed, the bombs at l'Etoile were apparently set because the head of the Cagoule, Eugene Deloncle, grew tired of waiting for what he believed was the inevitable communist uprising that would bring his pro-right organization into the limelight. He therefore decided to create the impression that a communist takeover was in the offing by placing bombs in locations that would cause much of the public logically to connect the explosions with left-wing violence. Deloncle later called the bombings a 'warning shot across the bow' ('un coup de semonce'). This was not mindless violence, but rather purposeful action meant to focus public discourse on the fate of the Third Republic."
(Murder in the Metro, Gayle K. Brunelle & Annette Finley-Croswhite, pg. 100)
the aftermath of one of the Cagoule's 9/11 bombings
In other words, the Cagoulards attempted to stage a false flag attack that would be blamed on the left, and especially the communists. This was a tactic that would later be employed by the Cold War-era stay-behind networks repeatedly. This tactic was especially prevalent in Italy, as was noted in my examination of Propaganda Due (P2). Also noted there was the practice of stockpiling firearms and creating caches of them across the nation. The Cagoulards had done the same throughout France during the mid-1930s.

The Cagoulards were of course not the only interwar group to employ these methods. Another curious instance is that of the infamous Thule Society. As was noted in my series on the Thulists, the secret society helped give rise to the Freikorps movement, paramilitary organizations that also stockpiled arms and suppressed communism in the immediate aftermath of the First World War. Later, many Freikorp veterans drifted into the SA.

The Cagoulards also featured aspects of a secret society, including an elaborate initiation ritual. The lower rungs of the Cagoule were largely paramilitary forces, though not as professional as the Friekorp raised by the Thulists. Still, there are some curious overlap. There is also the bizarre 9/11 connection. The Thulists, and later Nazi and fascist movements, would have strange links to the date of November 9, the birthday of Thule Society founder Rudolf von Sebottendorf. November 9 is 11/9, 9/11 in reverse. Both dates have curious ties to the far right. Most recently, Donald Trump was declared US President on 11/9.

von Sebottendorf
But back to the matter at hand. The downfall of the Cagoule occurred in November 1937. The Cagoulards had received "intelligence" that the communists were plotting an uprising some time between the days of November 15th and 16th. The led Deloncle and company to begin plotting a "counter-coup." No one seems to have taken these rumblings very seriously, however, and its is likely Deloncle intended this counter-coup to be another false flag. The Cagoulards would essentially starti attacking the communists on the 15th, eliciting a response. This in turn would then force the army to intervene, leading to a state of martial law. Here there are curious shades of the "strategy of tension" later developed by Italian neo-fascists linked to the stay-behinds. An instance is detailed here.

The army, however, was having none of it. They refused to support Deloncle, forcing him to call off the counter-coup after he had already activated his forces. What's more, after the 9/11 bombings and the near coup on November 15-16th, it seems that his backers had had enough. Support from the army and leading industrialists appears to have been primarily driven by fear of Blum and his Popular Front. But after Blum was driven from office, the usefulness of the Cagoule had begun to run its course. What's more, the actions of Deloncle and company since September had begun to threaten the gains made during much of that year. If the Cagoule were able to carry out another major attack and it was linked back to the outfit (and its backers), public support for Blum and the Popular Front would again emerge. For obvious reasons, this was not desirably to the traditional French conservative establishment. 

As such the police, who had been aware of the Cagoule since February 1937, began to roll up the operation by the end of November. By early 1938, virtually all of the leading Cagoulards, including Deloncle, were incarcerated.

This was hardly the end of the Cagoule, however. Indeed, the remnants of the organization would re-emerge during the Second World War and beyond and this version was far more powerful and deadly than the interwar incarnation. But before getting to that, we must first consider the legends surrounding the Cagoule, which will dealt with in the next installment. Until then dear reader, stay tuned.


More Philosophical Musings

$
0
0


Sky was kind enough to have me back on Philosophical Minds this past week. I dropped by earlier this month, but we had to cut the chat short due to scheduling miscommunications. Fortunately, I was to put in close to another hour last week.

Topics discussed include more speculation on how illicit funds (be it from arms, drugs, or sex trafficking) are used to fund black projects. Specifically, I get into some of the possibility surrounding the Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI --more commonly referred to as "Star Wars") that were raised in the amazing research of Geoffrey Gilson. Also discussed was the notorious gaming interest Resorts International, and it ties to the US intelligence community, the Profumo scandal, and Trump; how closely Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were to the Mossad; the rivalry between the Mossad and the Tory faction of MI6 during the Iran-Contra era; the British military-industrial complex; Robert Maxwell handling Israeli-backed arms trafficking for the Labour Party; "the Company", its ties to Trump and the Clintons and the allegations that it trained "devil worshipers"; psychological warfare; and probably some other topics I'm forgetting. We had planned to discuss continuity of government (COG), but ran out of time. That's a fascinating topic and hopefully Skyler and I can pick it up at some point this year. 

The podcast can be found here. For more information on Resorts International, check here. Elsewhere, the Company has been addressed before here and here.  

And with that, I shall sign off for now dear readers. Until next time, stay tuned. 


Wars and Psywars

$
0
0


On September 9, 2019, President Donald J. Trump sacked his National Security Adviser, the fanatical neocon and Zionist John Bolton. Of course, as with all things related to Trump, there is controversy over this action, with Bolton insisting that he resigned rather than being dismissed. Regardless, neither men disputes the date of when the decision to part company was made: 9/9/19. If those nines were reversed, one would be left with 6/6/16, which is vaguely close to the number of the beast. Given with how events transpired since then, this interpretation seems surprisingly apt.

On September 14, 2019, Houthi rebels attacked two of the largest oil processing facilities of Saudi Aramco, the House of Saud's "state owned" oil company. The attacks were a blow to energy markets, to put it mildly. But that may only be the beginning of the fallout.

one of the Saudi Aramco facilities that was hit in the drone strike
Despite the Houthis taking responsibility for the attack in retaliation for the Saudi "intervention" in Yemen that has left thousands dead and millions displaced, a case was rapidly made for Iran being behind the attack. This rush to judgment surely brought a smile to the face of the mustached-one. Anyone who has followed Bolton's career knows he has been obsessed with attacking Iran for years now. 

While Bolton will not now get a chance to personally oversee the attack, enough pressure may be brought to bear against Trump to force the Orange One's hand. Bolton has been disappointed before, however. Earlier this summer, Iran shot down an American droneReportedly, Trump was poised to launch an attack against Iran in retaliation, with Bolton being one of the biggest proponents of the strike. But at the last minute, the Orange One backed down, probably because a conflict with Iran could escalate into a Third World War.

Bolton seems little concerned over such fallout (har har), however, if his recent comments before the Gatestone Institute are any indications. Gatestone is friendly territory for Bolton --the Mustache was a former chairman of the think-tank, which is predictably anti-Muslim and Zionist to the core. As such, it was also an apt starting point for Bolton's post-Trump tour. Things have not be going well for the Israeli far right of late.

In addition to Bolton's dismissal/resignation, longtime Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is currently fighting for both his political life and to avoid being prosecuted for corruption. Prior to the recent election, Netanyahu had pledged to annex sensitive areas in the West Bank with "maximum coordination" from Trump. The Orange One then announced Bolton's "resignation" literally minutes later on Twitter, paving the way for the right wing Likud party to fall short at the ballots days later.

Netanyahu
It was something of a shot across the bow from Trump, who has largely been Israel's lapdog thus far. Indeed, at least one former senior member of the administration has described the Orange One as having been "played" by Netanyahu since taking office. Certainly, Trump's militancy towards Iran has played well to the US Israeli lobby, but not such much to his America First supporters. And with his own election looming next year, Trump appears to have been attempting to pivot in recent months with regards to Iran. Besides calling off a strike this past summer, he also appears to have been making efforts to meet with Iran's president.

In this context, the Saudi Aramco attack is certainly curious, to put it mildly. Less so is Bolton's publicity tour to rally the troops. Predictably, Bolton repeatedly attacked Trump's foreign policy at the Gatestone lunch and even indicated that the recent Saudi Aramco attacks only occurred because Trump had backed down from bombing Iran during the summer.

At least two donors present at the lunch are most interesting for our purposes here. One was attorney Alan Dershowitz. Dershowitz has of course gained a considerable degree of infamy of late, both due to role he played in helping Jeffrey Epstein get a sweetheart plea deal in 2008, and the allegations that he had "relations" with some of Epstein's girls. Naturally, Dershowitz referred to Bolton's sacking as "a national disaster." Surely it must have warmed Bolton's heart to know that Epstein's former attorney and an accused pedophile had his back.

Dershowitz
Dershowitz wasn't the only donor heaping praise upon the Mustache either. Rebekah Mercer described Bolton as "the best national security adviser our country could have hoped for," presumably without a hint of irony. The presence of a Mercer at this event is most noteworthy, especially in relation to Trump's re-election prospects.


The Mysterious Mercers

In Dark Money, Jane Meyer links the Mercer Klan to the Koch brothers network. The Mercer family appeared on the Koch brothers' donor list at some point during the '00s, and for a time they were close allies, but on the whole the Mercer family appears to be much further to the right. Despite the mainstream media's depiction of the Koch family as the pinnacle of right wing extremism, the Kochs are actually staunch adherents of the Mont Pelerin Society-derived neo-liberalism the dominates the liberal establishment in both the Republican and Democratic parties in these United States. Indeed, the Koch brothers covertly backed Hillary during the 2016 election

No, when it comes to financing the far right, it falls upon individuals such as Peter Thiel, and families like the Mercers and the DeVos-Prince Klan. The Mercer and DeVos-Prince families are closely aligned, being among the wealthiest backers of the highly secretive Council for National Policy (CNP). And like Thiel, the Mercer family are also major patrons of the alt-right. Indeed, the Mercer family became the largest financiers of Breitbart in 2012, upon the death of the founder. It was through Breitbart that the Mercers came into contact with Steve BannonKellyanne Conway, and Milo Yiannopoulos, all of whom they became patrons of (after the Mercers cut Milo off, he was picked up by fellow alt-right patron Matthew Mellon, a close Thiel associate, as I noted before here).

The patriarch of the Mercer family is Robert, a former computer scientist turned hedge fund manager. Mercer is often described as a pioneer in early artificial intelligence, though I have found few details concerning what this work may have entailed. Still, it is curious given the bizarre obsession certain fringe elements of the far right have with A.I.

Robert Mercer
What little is out there indications that Mercer's expertise is in computer linguistics, which he won a lifetime achievement award for in 2014. He worked for IBM for over twenty years before joining the hedge fund Renaissance Technologies in 1993. Renaissance is a curious entity, a hedge fund that preferred to hire computer scientists, mathematicians, and physicists rather than business school graduates. The company was founded by a mathematician and prominent Democratic Party donor, Jim Simons, who is also credited with contributing to the string theory. While working with Renaissance, Mercer is credited with transforming the financial industry through the use of trading algorithms.

On the whole, Robert Mercer has spent much of his life around some rather curious locations. He grew up in New Mexico and got his first real job at the Kirland Air Force Base. As regular reader of this blog are well aware, both New Mexico and especially the Kirkland base have been something of a mecca for black projects and general high weirdness for decades.

From there, upon being hired by IBM, he appears to have relocated to New York's Westchester County during the early 1970s. He would remain in the Westchester area for years afterwards, and certainly throughout the rest of the '70s and early '80s. It just so happens that that particular area of New York was allegedly the site of much cult activity during this same time frame. Indeed, the reputed Son of Sam cult was supposedly quite active in Westchester during that era. This bizarre link with Son of Sam would continue with Mercer's next residence, a mansion located on Long Island. Reportedly, mansions in this area were used for sex parties by VIPs and some of the cultists, as I noted before here.

Westchester
With that being said, I have found absolutely no evidence that Mercer was involved in anything nefarious that ties into the above locations. In point of fact, many of the alleged sex parties were for VIPs and Mercer did not cash until the late 1990s, after he left IBM. Still, it is strange that he turns up in locations like Kirkland and Westchester that are so closely associated with high weirdness. But then again, so does your humble researcher. Sometimes, a coincidence is just that. So, let us return to his more tangible outrages.   

Mercer appears to have had very little involvement in politics prior to the Obama years. He established the Mercer Family Foundation in 2004, but during the first few years it possessed an endowment of only half a million dollars and primarily focused on medical research and conventional charities. Things changed in 2008 , however, when the foundation began handing out millions to conservative causes and candidates. In less than a decade Robert Mercer went from being an obscure, inconsequential figure to being one of the driving forces in American politics. In some accounts, Mercer is held to be the single largest donor in the 2016 Us presidential elections. This only adds to the mysteries surrounding Mercer.


The Even More Mysterious SCL

On the note of mysteries, it is now time for the inevitable examination of Cambridge Analytica (CA), the "political consulting" firm believed to have played a crucial role in both Brexit and the election of the Orange One. The firm was able to obtain the data of 50 million Facebook users in these United States that was used to create a digital platform said to possess "unprecedented influence and accuracy." This platform was put to work in the 2016 US presidential elections, though there is much dispute as to how effective it was. It also played a role in Brexit, though there is more secrecy surrounding the latter deployment.

CA first gained notoriety in 2017 when it was linked to alleged Russian efforts to influence the 2016 US presidential elections. While there are some compelling indications that it had ties to shadowy Russian entities, it is the British aspect that is far more unsettling.

CA has its origins in a British company known as the SCL Group (formally Strategic Communications Laboratories). SCL in turn grew out of a company known as Behavioral Dynamics Institute, which was established by Nigel Oakes circa 1990. As the original name implies, the firm was concerned with behavior modification --specifically as it applied to group psychology and profiling. In other words, SCL specialized in psychological warfare. This has led to much speculation over SCL's ties to the British intelligence community, and indeed the company has been described as "MI6 for hire."


As such, it should come as little surprise that its ties to the British establishment are impeccable. Company founder Oakes is himself an Old Etonian, rumored to be an MI5 asset, and at one point dated a member of the Windsor family. But Oakes only scratches the surface of the firm's deep background.

Consider former CEO Alexander Nix, another Old Etonian as well. Nix comes from a long line of City bankers. This probably helped him with his business ventures prior to joining SCL. Upon graduating from the University of Manchester, he went to work for Barings Securities in Mexico. This was a former subsidiary of Barings Bank, one of the oldest merchant banks in the world at the time of its collapse in 1995. Barings was banker to the Queen herself and, according to former Barings employee Gerald James in his classic In the Public Interest, closely tied to the British intelligence community. Nix appears to have signed on after the collapse of the parent firm, though his initial work in Mexico is certainly suggestive: the nation was awash with drug money by this point.

Nix
However, it was Nix's second job that I find most interesting: the Robert Fraser Group (RFG). The RFG is another merchant bank, and a highly mysterious one at that. I have been unable to find virtually anything on its history, other than it having been founded around 1934. As far as this researcher can tell, it doesn't even have an official website.

At one point, it did have a most curious investor: Robert Maxwell, the infamous media tycoon and father of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's reputed madam. As was noted before here, Robert Maxwell had numerous intelligence connections, most notably to the KGB, Mossad, and MI6. In Maggie's Hammer, the great Geoffrey Gilson alleges that Maxwell was deeply involved in the illicit arms trafficking that ravaged the UK during the Thatcher years. More information on this traffic can be found here.

As far as the Robert Fraser Group is concerned, Maxwell began investing in it in 1986. During that same year, he became the single largest cash contributor to the bank's new equity and would remain its largest financial patron for the next five years. During this time, the ties between Maxwell and the RFG became quite close indeed. Maxwell's son, Kevin, joined the bank's board while its chairman, Lord Geoffrey Rippon, became a director of Maxwell Communications Corporation (MCC), one of the Maxwell family's various holding companies. The RFG would later be implicated in some of Maxwell's financial shenanigans.
"...  Through Robert Fraser, Maxwell had pumped into MCC and Pergamon Holdings some of the money taken from the pension funds, and had completed three property deals to pump profits into MCC which later investigation would reveal to be dubious. In 1989, no less than 35 per cent of MCC's profits were 'one-off' transactions with Robert Fraser recorded just before the announcement of the interim profits. In 1990, 43 per cent of the Group profits were one-offs with companies incorporated in Liechtenstein and the Isle of Man or with BIM and Robert Fraser..."
(Maxwell: The Final Verdict, Tom Bower, pgs. 69-70)
Maxwell gained infamy for looting the pension funds of his various companies and using these assets to support the stock prices of said companies via covert buybacks. The RFG appears to have been one of the institutions that Maxwell used to launder these pension fund assets back into his own companies.

Maxwell
But was it just the pension funds that Maxwell was using the Robert Fraser Group to launder? Were proceeds from the arms trafficking he was knee deep in also making their way through the RFG?

Certainly, this is very speculative on my part. What's more, Nix did not join the RFG until some time around the late 1990s or early 00s, a good decade or so after Maxwell and his cronies had been outed. Still, it is curious that Nix was able to parlay his limited experience at Barings and the RFG, two banks with a history of shady practices, into a directorship at SCL in 2003, when he would have been all of 28 years old.

What's more, at least two other establishment figures linked to the SCL were old guard Tories who would have been well placed in regards to the arms trafficking Thatcher unleashed during the Iran-Contra era. One was Sir Geoffrey Pattie, a longtime Tory MP who held several crucial posts in Thatcher's administration. The most noteworthy was Minister of State, Industry, and Information Technology. In this capacity, he oversaw the Department of Industry and Trade (DTI). As Gerald James notes throughout In the Public Interest, the DTI was deeply implicated in shady arms deals throughout the Thatcher years. And Sir Pattie directly oversaw the DTI for a time during this era. Before becoming a full blown Minister, he served as Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Defence Procurement, yet another post linked to arms sales. Indeed, Pattie appears to have spent much of the Thatcher years involved in the arms trade. He apparently impressed someone in this capacity, as he was knighted and made a member of the Privy Council in 1987.

the Right Honorable Sir Pattie
The other old guard Tory is Lord Jonathan Marland. Marland cut his teeth working for the Jardine Lloyd Thompson Group, which began as a division of Jardine Matheson and still maintained ties to the parent company until fairly recently. Marland had been a founding director of the Lloyd Thompson branch of the firm, which was acquired by Jardine in 1997.

Jaridne Matheson has its origins in the late eighteenth century in China and has remained one of the principal British businesses in eastern Asia for nearly two centuries now. For years the firm has been owned by the uber-connected Keswick family. Both Jardine Matheson and the Keswicks made much of their fortunes off of smuggling opium. When Jardine Lloyd Thompson was sold this year (2019), it was revealed that the Keswicks controlled 40 per cent of the company 

Since the beginning of this decade, Marland has held several government posts. But his real power is displayed by a position he held during the last decade: Treasurer of the Conservative Party. As the great Geoffrey Gilson demonstrated in Maggie's Hammer and Dead Men Don't Eat Lunch, this post has been deeply implicated in the funds generated by arms trafficking throughout the Thatcher years and beyond. In more recent years, several Treasurers have become leading Eurosceptics. Marland is no exception. He played a key role in getting Boris Johnson elected London's Mayor and has remained a close political alley since then. Naturally, Marland is a staunch Brexit backers as well.

the Right Honorable the Lord Marland
There are other curious figures linked to SCL, to be sure. Another notable is Lord Ivar Mountbatten. The Mountbatten Klan are part of the extended Royal Family. Ivar's father, David, was tied up in the Profumo scandal, while his brother George is listed in Epstein's black book. And then there's the original Lord Mountbatten, who has been hounded by allegations of sexually abusing children for years. More information on the vile Mountbatten Klan can be found here.

the Right Honorable the Lord Mountbatten
So, to recap: Long before the Mercer family became involved with Cambridge Analytica, its parent company, the SCL group, was deeply tied to the British Royal family, the aristocracy, and the City. But beyond that, at least three leading figures in the company may have been involved in the illicit arms trade that was unleashed by Thatcher. There seems to be little question that Sir Geoffrey Pattie had some connections given the post he held during the Thatcher administration. Elsewhere, SCL CEO Alexander Nix and crucial backer Lord Marland both held posts (with the Robert Fraser Group and as Treasurer of the Conservative Party, respectively), that have been implicated in this illicit trade, especially in regards to Marland. As such, SCL appears to have been an outgrowth of this black network that emerged during the 1980s, just as Nigel Oakes was laying the foundation for SCL. In creating what amounted to a privatized psychological warfare department, Oakes received support from the absolute pinnacle of the British establishment.

And many of these same figures were still present when the Mercers became leading financiers of this network. Indeed, SCL appears to have become a crucial component of the Anglo-American far right. Emerdata Limited, the successor to to Cambridge Analytica, brought together Nix, the Mercers, and Johnson Chun Shun Co, an executive for Erik Prince's Frontier Services Group. There are also rumblings of ties between this network and Peter Thiel as well. In other words, the gang's all present.


Going Forward

What then are we to make of the Mercer family's endorsement of Bolton upon his sacking by Trump? The Mercers were long time supporters of Bolton, and initially pushed for him to be nominated as Secretary of State. Now Bolton's gone, along with other figures backed by the Mercers such as Michael Flynn and Bannon. "Incidentally," their donations to the Republican Party declined during the last election cycle.

Bolton
Across the Pond, BoJo has taken a beating of late. On September 24th, the UK Supreme Court ruled his attempt to suspend Parliament unconstitutional. This came on the heels of Parliament enacting the Benn Bill, which requires BoJo to seek an extension of the Brext deadline --currently October 31, 2019 --if he has not reached a withdraw agreement with the EU and had it approved by Parliament by the nineteenth of that month. In theory, this took away BoJo's bid for a "hard" Brexit (i.e., without a reaching a withdraw agreement with the EU). Curiously, the new withdraw date the bill proposes is January 31, 2020.

A reader has recently pointed out to me that part of the support for Brexit within the UK establishment is driven by a little known piece of legislation being pushed by the EU and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). It is related to their on going concern with cracking down on tax avoidance by large corporations. To this end, the EU and OECD crafted the Anti tax avoidance package. This package has especially strong provisions in regards to the financing of terrorism.

The City of London is of course at the heart of a vast network of tax havens around the world. As such, it is also at the heart of vast network supporting terrorists and international criminals. As Maggie's Hammer demonstrates, this state of affairs grew out of the transformation of the UK's economy under Thatcher, specifically the arms trade. In other words, many of the same players behind the SCL on the UK end grew out of the same City subculture that helps finance much of today's terrorism. And the EU/OECD anti tax avoidance package seems specifically designed to put an end to these state of affairs by bringing the City into compliance with the EU's broader tax laws. No doubt the French and Germans had hard-ons the size of Gibraltar when crafting these regulations.

As such, it is easy to see why figures like those behind the SCL Group have a vested interest in the UK leaving the EU if, for no other reason, to avoid these looming regulations. And when does the anti-tax avoidance package go into effect dear readers? Why, January 1, 2020.

This looming deadline is likely what has driven BoJo's hail marry to ensure a hard Brexit by October 31. It is also likely what is behind the Benn Bill deadline of January 31, 2020, a nearly a month after the tax avoidance regulations are to be enacted. This is a very clever move to get BoJo and his backers to make concessions.

BoJo
BoJo, however, seems hell bent on a snap election. While this may seem insane on the surface given his recent disasters, there's probably some version of Cambridge Analytica still lurking about and ready to spring into action. As such, BoJo is putting his faith in their voodoo and desperation to exit the EU by the new year.

Here in these United States, the Orange One is facing a new scandal, this time over Ukraine. The scandal broke on September 18th, four days after the Saudi Aramco attacks. By the 24th, it had led to the announcement of formal impeachment proceedings.

There are already some indications that this latest "smoking gun" is stillborn. Naturally, the "whistleblower" in this case appears to be a CIA officer who didn't actually hear the controversial conversations between Trump and his counterpart in the Ukraine. Given the timing of when these allegations were made, it was almost surely an intentional leak meant to further pressure Trump over Iran. Was this payback from Bolton, who apparently had been playing the Washington leak game during his final months in office?

The Orange One's reluctance to launch an attack is almost surely driven by his own looming re-election bid in 2020. Another Middle Eastern war would be problematic to that end, but possibly less so than an impeachment hearing, especially if he no longer has the Mercer psy war machine in his corner.

On the other hand, Trump is also dealing with a curious alliance between far right elements in the US and UK, the Israeli Likud/Mossad faction, and nationalist elements in the Russian FSB and mafia (all of these factions were present in the Cambridge/SLC psyops network as well). Iran certainly appears to be a point of contention for this peculiar alliance. For the Orange One, this is a delicate balancing act as he attempts to play to US and Israeli neo-con/Zionists on the one hand, and various nationalists on the other. That the neo-liberal order is being pawned by this shaky alliance is a further testament to its decline.

In any case, it is looking like sparks could really start to fly by Halloween 2019, if not sooner. The fate of Trump, Brexit, Iran, and Netanyahu are all in play while the Epstein scandal continues to loom in the background, a proverbial sword of Damocles over the neo-liberal order. And with that, I shall sign off for now dear readers. Until next time, stay tuned.


Back on We've Read the Documents

$
0
0


The great John Brisson was kind enough to have me back on We've Read the Documents earlier this week. In the span of just over an hour we managed to cover several complex topics, including the John Birch Society and the American Security Council; the origins of Alex Jones, the conspiratorial right, and the American militia movement in those shadowy bodies; propaganda and how it is skillfully applied; the Council for National Policy (CNP) and the various individuals linked to it; the CNP's influence on the Trump administration; the far right Hunt familyLe CercleEpstein and Robert Maxwell; the shadowy Regnery family, their decades spanning association with the far right, and their bizarre patronage of especially esoteric strands of Ufology; the upcoming 2020 US presidential elections, Trump's likely re-election and the looming shitshow that will be Hillary 2020. I'm sure there were more topics that I'm forgetting as well. I also offered some latest developments on my upcoming book with Frank Zero as well as the progress on my Epstein book.

The interview can be found here.

More information on the American Security Council, the John Birch Society, and so forth can be found here.

My initial series on Le Cercle can be found here.

Epstein and the Maxwells were addressed in the following articles:
Maxwell's Silver Hammer
Epstein's Little Black Book
Epstein Dies: Long Live the New Mexico Connection?
Russian Games

The CNP and some of the more current topics discussed in this interview were partly inspired by this recent post.

As always dear readers, I hope everyone enjoys. For long time readers who have been missing some of the more high weirdness-centric posts, take heart. I've got two very curious pieces that I'm currently working on that should be ready by the end of the month. For the time being, remain patient and stay tuned.



The Lovecraftian Enlightenment?

$
0
0


"... these things we’re summoning into the world right now…are more like the Lovecraftian The Great Old Ones, they’re entities that are not necessarily going to be aligned with what we want..."

Its no secret that H.P. Lovecraft is more popular than ever as the second decade of the twenty-first century fast comes to a close. During his lifetime (1890-1937), Lovecraft's famed "weird tales" were confined to pulp magazines, ensuring a limited audience for his works. In this day and age, eighty plus years after HPL shed his mortal coil, probably even fewer people have actually read his at-times copious prose. But those who did over the years took it to heart, and expanded upon his mythos and made it more commercially viable. As such, the mythos he allegedly created wholesale (which is highly debatable) have had a vast influence on popular culture. Indeed, it would be almost impossible to imagine the modern horror genre without Lovecraft.

The mainstreaming of Lovecraft really began in earnest during the first decade of this particular century and it coincided with the general rise of nerd culture. Nerds in turn have largely become the engine of popular culture over the past two decades thanks to the broader rise of Silicon Valley and the tech industry in general. Techies and nerds the are often one in the same and the innovations of the former made it increasingly possible to craft the aspirations of the latter via CGIs, increasingly elaborate video game platforms and so forth. And of course, there was the whole rise of the Internet, which made it easier for nerds to forge communities and spread their obsessions.


One was of course H.P. Lovecraft, whose mythos represent one of the darker corners of geekdom. But Lovecraft was only one such corner. On the whole, there are even more sinister undercurrents to geekdom.  

Of late, I've become fascinated (and more than a little disturbed) by a particularly bizarre branch of the "alt-right" sometimes referred to as the Dark Enlightenment, or simply NRx (neo-reactionary). Incidentally (or not), this curious ideology together brings Silicon Valley, the dark side of geekdom and of course Lovecraft in what might be one of the most dystopian of imagined futures.

The Dark Enlightenment and/or NRx can mean different things to different people, but certain characteristics seem to be reoccurring amongst the various ideologues: contempt for democracy, an obsession with technology and capitalism in equal measures, libertarian ethos taken to their logical extreme, a thinly veiled approval for eugenics, and a sense that the darkest of imagined cyberpunk futures is something to aspire towards. It is generally agreed that the two principal visionaries behind this particular ideology are Curtis Yarvin (aka Mencius Moldbug) and Nick Land.


Mr. Moldburg and the Eye of Thiel

Geekdom and Lovecraft in particular weigh heavily on both men, while Yarvin is very much a creation of Silicon Valley. Before becoming a neo-reactionary blogger, Yarvin was a computer scientist with degrees from John HopkinsBrown, and UC Berkeley. Naturally, he was based out of San Francisco. Despite the ultra-liberal image of the tech heartlands, there are indications that the Valley has a small but influential alt right underground.

Yarvin routinely incorporates elements of geekdom into his writings. Lovecraft made an appearance early, in the first part of Yarvin's A gentle introduction to Unqualified Reservations. There, Yarvin riffs on the introduction Darren Staloff’s The Making of an American Thinking Class by quoting the professor's prose while replacing several phrases with references to Miskatonic UniversityCryptomenysis PatefactaUnaussprechlichen Kulten, and the "mad Arab Abdul Alhazred."

Inevitably, Cthulhu would turn up in Yarvin's writings. A gentle introduction... names drops him no less than ten times. Amusingly, Yarvin likens the high priest of the Great Old Ones to his concept of "The Cathedral." The Cathedral in turn can be defined loosely as a consensus of progressive opinion outlined by the universities, the media, and the civil service. It is given a religious description because it has become a kind of theology. In 2019, a planet destroying alien high priest is as apt a description for the mainstream consensus as one is apt to find.

Yarvin clearly knows his geekdom, which has led some to question the seriousness of his ideology. To be sure, there is an air of a LARP lark about Mr. Moldburg.

Yarvin
Which is why it is important to remember that Yarvin has received support from none other than Peter Thiel, who is a major investor in Yarvin's startup, Urbit. Nor is Yarvin the only neo-reactionary ideologue that Thiel has sponsored. He is also a major backer of the Seasteading Institute, founded by would-be neo-reactionary Patri Friedman (who is also the grandson of Noble Prize winning economist Milton). Elsewhere, Thiel was also a backer of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, which neo-reactionary blogger Michael Anissimov had previously worked at as a media director.


Patri Friedman (top) and Michael Anissimov (bottom)
But beyond sponsoring the Dark Enlightenment, Thiel himself is also a major ideological influence. Both Yarvin and Nick Land have cited a 2009 essay by Thiel for Cato Unbound in which the billionaire famously declared "I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible" as a major inspiration. The influence may swing both ways as well, for it has been argued that a 2012 lecture at Stanford by Thiel displayed traces of Yarvin's themes.

Is Thiel's sponsorship for neo-reactionary ideologues and influence on the movement evidence that it is a kind of vehicle for his own personal beliefs? Certainly, this is not beyond the realm of extreme possibility, and that is a terrifying prospect. As I noted recently, Thiel is at the absolute vanguard of the far right, along with the Mercer and DeVos-Prince families. What's more, Thiel and the after-mentioned families appear to be major players in a vast private intelligence network behind both Trump and Brexit.

In the above-linked blog, I detailed the ties between the Mercer family and the SCL Group/Cambridge Analytica, which could be likened to a private, digitalized Psychological Warfare ExecutiveGrowing evidence has emerged that Thiel's Palantir Technologies collaborated with this network.

Naturally, Palantir takes its name from from a communications devise depicted in the Lord of the Rings trilogy. Given that these devices were later taken over by Sauron, the name is rather apt. Palantir is a big data analytics outfit that is known to work closely with the Department of Defense and US intelligence community. Of late it has gained much controversy over its collaboration with ICE, but its mining of data as a means of surveillance has been ongoing for years now.


Nor is Palantir the only defense-related company Thiel has ties too. Another curious entity is Carbyne, an Israeli company which officially provides high tech solutions to emergency centers fielding 911 calls and such like. In carrying out these duties Carbyne is given access to a caller's GPS, camera and other private information, which critics have alleged creates a high potential for abuse. These claims are further substantiated by the presence of numerous former Israeli intelligence officers among the shareholders and employees. Company director Pinchas Berkus, for instance, is the former head of the elite 8200 Unit.


The Israelis aren't the only ones with intelligence ties linked to Carbyne either. Present on the company's advisory board is Michael Chertoff, a former director of the Department of Homeland Security and co-author of the Patriot Act. After leaving government with the Bush II regime, Chertoff went into the private defense industry, starting his own "risk management" group with a former CIA officer and became the chairman of the mega British defense contractor BAE Systems.

Else, a co-founder and shareholder of Carbyne is another former Israeli intelligence officer, Lital Leshem. Leshem is also an executive director at Frontier Resources Group, a subsidiary of Frontier Services Group. FSG was of course founded by Erik Prince, whose FSG concern also appears in the SCL/Cambridge Analytica network.

And then there's former Israeli prime minister and highly decorated general Ehud Barak. Barak was also a major investor in the company, bu with a curious source for his funding: Jeffrey Epstein. In 2015, Barak formed a startup company called Sum for the sole purpose of investing in what became Carbyne. Reportedly, much of the capital for Sum was provided to Barak by Epstein.

Ehud Barak
This certainly puts Thiel in some curious company. Thiel is not only an investor in Carbyne, but also has a Palantir co-founder, Trae Stephens, on the company's advisory board.

Clearly, Thiel is well represented in the private intelligence racket. But under Trump, he has begun to make inroads with the official US intel community as well. Reportedly, Thiel himself was offered a leadership role on the influential President's Intelligence Advisory Board, but turned it down. He did, however, land former employee and reputed acolyte Kevin Harrington on the National Security Council. Harrington occupied a senior post from the get go and was reportedly bumped up further in recent days.

Kevin Harrington
Thiel has clearly emerged as a major player, with extensive ties to both the US intelligence community and the president himself. Indeed, he was likely at the forefront of the private initiatives to get Trump into the White House. And of course, there is the curious fact that he was a major investor in the Israeli firm Carbyne, along with Jeffrey Epstein. This is more tangible evidence that Epstein's network was part of the broader effort to put Trump into power. Thiel appears to have been at the center of these efforts.

And this is the man who is a crucial backer of the founder of the Dark Enlightenment and other major proponents. Of course, Thiel himself was clearly a major ideological influence as well, which at a minimum contributed to his support for the ideology. Even more sinister is the prospect that Thiel himself was the engine behind the Dark Enlightenment, with Yarvin and others simply being used to put things out there that Thiel himself did not wish to be directly associated with. It would certainly be interesting to know how far back Yarvin's relationship with Thiel goes.


A Land Darkly

My concern with this piece, however, is with Lovecraft's influence on the Dark Enlightenment, and that is nowhere more evident that with the movement's other founder, former Warwick University professor Nick Land. While Yarvin may have been the originator of NRx, it was Land who elevated it to the level of a true philosophy. This is hardly surprising, given Land's background as a philosophy professor.

During his time at Warwick, Land became involved with a student-run research group dubbed the "Cybernetic Culture Research Unit" (Ccru). This peculiar group was established in October of 1995, when self-described "cyberfeministSadie Plant joined the faculty at Warwick. Land co-founded the Ccru with Plant and several others. Its relationship with Warwick was always rather ambiguous, however. It was active on the campus between 1995 and 1997, but was officially shuttered after Plant resigned her post in '97. At the time, some school officials claimed the Ccru never even existed.

Sadie Plant
It continued on, in some form or another, for at least six additional years. Land had resigned from Warwick himself by '98, and would continue the group in a room above the Leamington Spa Body Shop for a few more years. Drugs had always been a major influence on the group, but by this point in time they had become epidemic. As such, the post-Warwick Ccru has been described as "quasi-cultish, quasi-religious."

This is hardly surprising, given its pursuits. The Ccru's purpose was to study a host of arcane topics --French philosophy (especially of the Deleuzian school), jungle music, science fiction (unsurprisingly, cyberpunk was a huge influence, especially Gibson's Neuromancer), cryptography, the occult (the group was especially fond of the kabbalah and Crowley, who was born in the same city that Warwick University is located in), rave culturecybernetics, and, of course, Lovecraft. From this heady brew emerged a cyber-age version of "Accelerationism."

an emblem designed by the Ccru
First conceived of by French philosophers in the wake of May of '68, the Ccru laid the foundation for the popularization of this particular philosophy in the English speaking world during the twenty-first century. The Ccru's version of accelerationism essentially called for the rapid speeding up of capitalism and technology in equal measures. In theory, this would lead humanity towards some type of techno-utopia resembling notions of the Singularity. By unleashing capital, silly relics of the past such as national borders could be dissolved. This would, in theory, release human potential and speed up technological advances. Ominously, some proponents believed that this would eventually liberate human potential from the human form all together.

Land certainly subscribed to these beliefs. As I noted before here, Land had happened upon the notion during his Ccru days that capitalism was the creation of an artificial intelligence from the future, which in turn had used the market to gradually assemble itself over the centuries. This would end with the glorious usurpation of humanity by this new intelligence. And Land apparently believed that we should be doing everything within out collective power to speed up this copious process. Whether this is still the case is unknown to this researcher, but he is still insisting on the similarities between capitalism and AI.

This was not the only strangest notion Land happened upon during this era either. At the height of the Ccru days, Land began heavily abusing "the sacred substance amphetamine" and subsisting on little to no sleep. During his final days at Warwick, he became known for amphetamine-addled lectures, which at times Land delivered while laying on the floor and accompanied by a jungle soundtrack. Eventually, he came to believe that he was being inhabited by various entities, which he dubbed "Cur," "Vauung," and "Can Sah."

Predictably, Land had a breakdown by the early part of millennium. He disappeared from public life all together for a time, and relocated to Shanghai. Nor was he the only Ccru that danced to close to the flame. Many members would struggle with depression for years afterwards. One of the most prominent members, Mark Fisher, eventually committed suicide in 2017, reportedly over concerns that Britain had entered into "stasis."

Mark Fisher
Throughout all of this, Lovecraft weighed heavily on Land and has continued to do so. Together with the Ccru troop, Land developed the notion of "hyperstition." Combining superstition with hyper, this concept is difficult to define. It has been described as that which is "equipoised between fiction and technology." In a sense, this is simply describing science fiction in its earliest incarnations. At least one former Ccru affiliate described Land's hyperstition as "quasi-Lovecraftian mythologies." Reportedly, Land came to believe that the Necronomicon itself was being sent back in time from the future, piece by piece, beginning with its appearances in Lovecraft's fiction.

Another concept that Land and his Ccru cohorts became obsessed with was the notion of "theory-fiction." In essence, it help that the writing of theory could fictionalize and produce reality. Such a notion would have had quite an appeal in the '90s, when imagined cyberpunk futures were beginning to become the reality. Now, we're effectively living in a cyberpunk novel. William Gibson, in essence, took scientific theory concerning future technologies, fictionalized it, and provided a template for our present reality.

The same could be said of Lovecraft, who was clearly more knowledgeable concerning the occult than scholars would have you believe. His fictionalized mythos, in turn, arguably did as much to mainstream the occult in popular culture as anyone, with the possible exception of Crowley. And Crowley himself frequently resorted to fiction to expand upon his theories.

Crowley
Naturally, Land himself has written horror fiction as well, and it is firmly in the Lovecraftian camp. He seems to have first taken up this interest during the late '90s, when he wrote The Origins of the Cthulhu Club. This work was allegedly the first time he rolled out the hyperstititon concept. His Lovecraft obsession has continued in recent works such as 2014's short story Phyl-Undhu and 2015 novella Chasm. Indeed, it would seem that when Land isn't championing the Dark Enlightenment, he is crafting neo-Lovecraftian weird fiction.


Conclusions

Let us then return to the quote that opens this piece, which concerns emerging AI as being something akin to the Great Old Ones of Lovecraft's fiction. This is a notion that Nick Land has been prophesying about since roughly the mid-1990s. But is this something that we should really be concerned about? After all, Land is still largely a fringe figure. 

Peter Thiel, however, is not. And while Thiel has never been directly linked to Land, he has certainly supported other such fellow travelers, as was noted above. And this raises some truly disturbing prospects. 

The scientific community is often seen as progressive and forward looking. This is especially true of the tech sector. And yet William Shockley, the alleged inventor of the transistor (which essentially laid the foundation for the modern computer revolution), dedicated much of his later life to the rehabilitation of eugenics (noted before here). Thiel himself made his fortune investing in tech companies such as PayPal and Facebook. He is now one of the principal patrons of the alt-right, along with hedge fund manager Robert Mercer. Before delving into finance, Mercer was a computer scientist who worked for IBM for decades. As I noted before here, he contributed to the development of AI in this capacity.

Robert Mercer
These men are a far cry from the Christian fundamentalists who are often associated with the far right, and arguably far more unsettling. After all, men like Thiel and Mercer have the resources and potentially the inclination to bring about the post-human future envisioned by men like Land. This is precisely why I find many of the scientific-related revelations concerning Epstein so unsettling. 

In many ways, Jeffrey Epstein was already practicing what many of the NRx ideologues had been advocating. One such instance is the whole "seasteading" movement which Thiel has become a principal patron of. As I noted before here, one of its leading proponents was the above-mentioned Patri Friedman. Seasteading proposes building floating, sovereign city city-states in the ocean. These entities would be beyond the reach of the United States government, or any other for that matter. A return to the model of the city-state, a small entity more easily manageable than a chaotic nation-state, has long appealed to neo-reactionaries.

Of course, Jeffrey Epstein had been using his own private island, Little Saint James, as a lawless playground for millionaires and billionaires alike for years. While he surely wasn't the originator of such a notion, the possibility is strong that Epstein's efforts inspired the seasteading community in some capacity. Patri Friedman was involved in a transhumanist foundation supported by Epstein, after all.

Jeffrey Epstein
There are even far more ominous overlaps, most notably via the scientific community. Of course, many neo-reactionaries are obsessed with AI and related notions such as transhumanism/human augmentation, and the Singularity. This is hardly surprising, given the background that many of the proponents have in tech and Silicon Valley in particular.

Epstein clearly had a keen interest in these things as well. He was a major backer of pioneering AI researcher Marvin Minsky, who was also a crucial scientific adviser to Epstein. It was Minsky who put Epstein into contact with another young and upcoming AI researcher, Joscha Bach. Bach had been involved in the transhumanist outfit, humanity +, that also featured budding neo-reactionary Patri Friedman and funding from Epstein himself. Epstein also funded Ben Goertzel, the former chairman of Humanity +, the founder and CEO of SingularityNET, and a prominent AI researcher. Epstein also funded Goertzel's open source AI project OpenCog as well. Goertzel had also been the research director at the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, which received funding from Thiel and produced neo-reactionary blogger Michael Anissimov, a former media director there.

Ben Goertzel
Of course, Epstein was also an investor in the above-mentioned Carbyne, along with Thiel. As such, this whole network seems rather incestuous. What's more, the NRx crowd would surely approve of the motives behind Epstein's philanthropy. He had alleged that mainstream foundations were failing science because they had become too "politically correct." Epstein was quick to point out that he supported diversity, but of ideas, and not people.

Besides AI and some of the fringe ideologies surrounding it, Epstein had another clear scientific passion: genetics. I've already dealt with this topic a bit before here, but even more information has come out since that post. In point of fact, Epstein spent much of this decade investing in genetic research. Specifically, Epstein sought to analyse and sequence human DNA. In time, this would be used to build a database. In theory, this database would have been sold to drug companies for a tidy profit, but given the man's apparent interest in eugenics, one has to wonder.

And that brings me to one of Land's darkest visions. In the final section of his landmark Dark Enlightenment essay, Land singles out University of California biologist John H. Campbell, whom he hails as a "prophet of monstrosity." This is as apt a description as any for a man who may have given away the endgame of the elite Epstein represented. His notions have been described as thus:
"Reasoning that the majority of humankind will not voluntarily accept qualitative population-management policies, Campbell points out that any attempt to raise the IQ of the whole human race would be tediously slow. He further points out that the general thrust of early eugenics was not so much species improvement as the prevention of decline. Campbell’s eugenics, therefore, advocates the abandonment of Homo sapiens as a 'relic' or 'living fossil' and the application of genetic technologies to intrude upon the genome, probably writing novel genes from scratch using a DNA synthesizer. Such eugenics would be practiced by elite groups, whose achievements would so quickly and radically outdistance the usual tempo of evolution that within ten generation the new groups will have advanced beyond our current form to the same degree that we transcend apes."
Was Epstein's venture into human DNA studies such a foray? Were the proceeds of his child sex trafficking being used to bring about a godlike elite that would fundamentally cease being human? The great Christopher Knowles has been warning against such developments on The Secret Sun for years. The Epstein revelations should make it clear that Mr. Knowles' warnings are no longer mere speculation, but are presently ongoing amongst the darkest corners of the deep private. Much of it is happening openly among prestigious scientific institutes, but I suspect a man like Epstein would be needed to further the more sinister aspects.

Land himself is coy about how he perceives these developments, but he clearly seems to believe that what is emerging will resemble something out of Lovecraft. He remarks: "For racial nationalists, concerned that their grandchildren should look like them, Campbell is the abyss. Miscegenation doesn’t get close to the issue. Think face tentacles."

Nick Land
Land has speculated about both an AI and the Necronomicon from the future meddling in our current world. But this researcher can't help but think of a more chilling scenario: What if it is the Great Old Ones themselves who are melding in the present from the future. And what if accelerationism and the Dark Enlightenment are one such bid to harness capitalism and technology towards one obvious end: their own creation and a distinctly post-human future. Are Lovecraft's demonic space gods then our own future when a tendril-faced elite final sever all ties to humanity and Earth as a whole? Certainly, I suspect such a notion has passed through Land's mind. And he may well be okay with such an outcome.

But the real question is, are men like Epstein and Thiel concerned with such an endgame? Based on circumstantial evidence, such a possibility can not be dismissed. And that is something that is truly horrifying to contemplate. This is why, as I've suggested before, that Epstein's child sex trafficking is not the darkest abyss. Rather, it is what the funds from this endeavor were being used to sponsor. And that may well be the birth of the Great Old Ones.

        

Recluse on Forbidden Knowledge

$
0
0


Chris at Forbidden Knowledge News was kind enough to have me on a few days ago. We tackled a host of topics. At the forefront was Epstein and his links to various black projects as well as the sinister implications underlining his dabblings in genetic modifications. We also had a wide ranging discussion on ARTICHOKE and MK-ULTRA, including the history of both programs, common misconceptions, the successor programs, the extreme high weirdness associated with both and, most importantly, there actual purpose. Hint: It went well beyond mere mind control. We also found time to discuss how the methods of ARTICHOKE and MK-ULTRA may have been applied psychological warfare on a mass scale.

Also discussed are the modern history of honey trapping in the US and its origins with the British security services that gave birth to the Office of Strategic Services. Incidentally, this also ties into the origins of occult pursuits within the Anglo-American intelligence services as well. Finally, there's a little reflection on the recent UFO "disclosures"; Twin Peaks: The Return; the upcoming elections; the different factions within the American deep state; whether they will plunge these United States into a civil war and what would come afterwards; if there's an opportunity to change things; my upcoming book with Frank Zero and Jeremy Knight of ZeroKnight and other projects we have in store, which will be rolling out soon; the Epstein book I'm working on as well as another work I've been researching for a number of years now.

The podcast can be found here.

For more information, check the following:

Epstein is addressed in the following blogs:
Maxwell's Silver Hammer
Epstein's Little Black Book
Epstein Dies: Long Live the New Mexico Connection

A potential end game for the research Epstein was funding:
The Lovecraftian Enlightenment

UFOs and psychedelics:
Contact

The Office of Security, high weirdness, and Project ARTICHOKE:
The Office of Security: A Tale of Sex, Drugs, and High Weirdness series
The Office of Security Meet the Nine Part I
The Office of Security Meet the Nine Part II

As always dear readers, I hope that everyone enjoys. Stay tuned until next time.



The Secret History of Special Operations Forces

$
0
0


As long time readers of this blog are well aware, Recluse has quite the obsession with what are known as special operations forces (SOFs) in these United States and simply special forces in most of the rest of the world. These elite units first began to captivate the public mind during the Second World War. This conflict witnessed the birth of the Special Air Services (SAS), the first modern special operations forces unit (including the likes of the US Army Special Forces (more commonly known as the "Green Berets" and the even more elite Delta Force), as well as the emergence of "frogmen," who served as the model for the Special Boat Services (SBS), Navy SEALS, and other such outfits.

The history of special operations forces is a murky one. Certainly, there are precedents from the ancient world such as the Praetorian or Varangian Guards. As far as modern units are concerned, their origins are often placed in various European colonial wars that unfolded during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Some of the earliest "commandos" (which are often considered the direct predecessors to modern special operations forces) were Boer forces that employed proto-guerrilla techniques as far back as the early eighteenth century.

The British fought several brutal conflicts with the Boers, climaxing with the genocidal Second Boer War (1899-1902). While the British ultimately prevailed, they had to commit a tremendous amount of forces to counter the significantly out numbered Boer forces. No doubt these experiences strongly influenced Britain's later special operations forces. Another crucial influence was no doubt the Irish Republican Army. Other noteworthy inspirations included Orde Wingate, who helped set up what became the Haganah (later the Israel Defense Force) and Lawrence of Arabia himself.

T.E. Lawrence, more commonly known as Lawrence of Arabia
Virtually everyone agrees that the modern special operations forces we all know and love (or not) emerged in earnest during the Second World War. But many of the most celebrated units, which have inspired virtually all modern SOFs, feature some very curious and aristocratic figures lurking in the background. Two such instances shall be examined over the course of this blog.


Roman Frogmen

First up is the legendary Decima Flottiglia MAS, some times known simply as X'MAS (har har). In English written accounts it is often referred to as the Tenth Light Flotilla, though this translation is a bit off. Regardless, the X'MAS was the most feared unit within the Italian Army by a large margin. Given how notoriously poor the Italian military performed under Mussolini, it is somewhat surprising that it crafted such an elite force. 

The X'MAS essentially pioneered Naval special operations. Contemporaries such as the SBS and SEALs all trace the origins back to this particular unit and its easy to see why. In three years, the X-MAS produced quite an impressive track record:
"... On many of the 10th's operations, special assault teams entered harbors riding underwater torpedo-shaped submersibles known as Chariots, and attached explosives to the hulls of Allied ships at anchor. The crack assault teams brought devastation in Crete's Suda Bay and Alexandra harbor, sinking or severely damaging several British capital ships, including the battleships Queen Elizabeth and Valiant.
"The group's most audacious coup was its campaign of sneak attacks against Allied shipping in Gibraltar. A derelict freighter, the Olterra, was seemingly abandoned off the Spanish coast. But the Olterra was a Trojan horse. Her hold served as a clandestine workshop where the frogman could repair and rearm the Chariots. Access in and out of the ship was afforded by a sliding door six feet below the waterline. All told, the Italians sank 42,000 tons of Allied ships anchored at Gibraltar; the British never discovered the secret of the freighter."
(Operatives, Spies, and Saboteurs, Patrick K. O'Donnell, pg. 131)
the insignia of the X'MAS
Things became even more interesting in 1943, after Italy was pushed out of North Africa and the Allied invasion of Sicily began. Mussolini was briefly deposed by the Grand Council of Fascism, who then sought to negotiate with the Allies. Mussolini was arrested, but soon rescued by the Germans, who set him up as the puppet head of the Italian Social Republic. What it amounted to is that by the end of 1943, Germany effectively controlled all of Northern Italy while the Allies held the south.

The loyalties of Italians were divided between these two entities, and the same appears to have been the case of the X'MAS. The Office of Strategic Services (OSS, the WWII-era predecessor of the CIA) had attempted to develop their own frogmen units on the basis of the Marine Raiders, but without much success. Realizing that they would be hard pressed to top the X'MAS, the OSS opted for the only sensible choice: enlist the unit.

insignia of the OSS
While many X'MAS men opted to side with the Nazis, enough veterans were retained to form the Grupo Mezzini d'Asalto. It was put under the control of the Duke of Aosta. The OSS wasted no time in putting them to use. Joint OSS-X'MAS missions began as soon as June of 1944. Soon, the X'MAS forces had become the OSS's go-to Naval commandos in the European Theater. In addition to sabotage operations, the X'MAS men were also enlisted to gather intelligence and train Italian partisans in the arts of "unconventional warfare" deep behind enemy lines.

The results were so impressive that the OSS wanted to dispatch the X'MAS/Grupo Mezzini d'Asalto to the Pacific Theater once things began to wind down in Europe. The OSS was largely barred from that Theater by General Douglas MacArthur and Admiral Chester Nimitz, both of whom despised the agency. As such, the order for a transfer never came through.

Unwilling to let such available assets simply disperse, some X'MAS veterans were enlisted to provide consulting to the Navy's postwar underwater operations program. No doubt this included the Underwater Demolition Teams which, along with the OSS's Maritime Units, are considered the direct predecessors to the modern Navy SEALS. And it just so happens that the X'MAS collaborated with and/or trained both.

insignia of the Underwater Demolition Teams
Elsewhere, the X'MAS men who opted to side with the Nazis had a similar experience. Upon conclusion of the operations to occupy Northern Italy by German forces, the bulk of the X'MAS offered their services to the Nazis. As such, this faction retained the Decima MAS identification. However, its ties to the Italian Social Republic (RSI) were nominal at best. Indeed, the unit reported directly to SS Obergruppenfuhrer Karl Wolff, the supreme commander of SS forces in Italy. Nor did it swear an oath of loyalty to the RSI.

During the Nazi years, the scale of the X'MAS grew even as its naval operations largely ceased. As the great Jeffrey Bale notes in The Darkest Sides of Politics, I, it came to include several elite infantry battalions, s small naval sabotage unit, and police company with its own intelligence and interrogation center. Indeed, the X'MAS appears to have acquired quite an extensive intelligence network by war's end that went well beyond Italy. In addition to the police intelligence unit, it also had an espionage headquarters in Switzerland and a vast network throughout the RSI and even into the Allied-controlled south.

Frequently the X'MAS was deployed into the hottest zones. Often it was used to conduct counterinsurgency operations against partisans in the RSI. Some units were deployed to the Anzio front, where they reportedly fared well against US Army Rangers. Later, many of its forces were dispatched Yugoslavia, where it conducted further counterinsurgency against the partisans there. And finally, there were the X'MAS' "stay-behind" operations set up in Allied-controlled Italy. By all accounts, these stay-behind units were highly effective. It fell to the legendary counterintelligence master James Jesus Angleton to counter the X'MAS.

For our purposes here, the most interesting aspect of the X'MAS was its commanding officer, Prince Junio Valerio Borghese, sometimes referred to as the "Black Prince." In this day and age, Borghese is primarily known for his association with fascism, both during World War II and beyond. As I noted before here, he became one of the most prominent supporters of the far right philosopher and occultist, Julius Evola. Borghese also appears to have played a crucial role in establishing stay-behind networks in Italy after World War II as part of what is often referred to as Operation Gladio. Given the X'MAS' role in organizing stay-behinds during WWII, it is hardly surprising the CIA would look to the Black Prince at the onset of the Cold War. Later, these forces were linked to a neo-fascist coup Borghese attempted to launch in 1970. There is much dispute as to how serious this coup actually was and what its ultimate purpose was, however. The best account can be found in Bale's The Darkest Sides of Politics, I.

the Black Prince
For our purposes here, it is the Black Prince's origins that are of greatest interest. Borghese was a member of the famed Italian dynasty --the one that spawned at least one pope and numerous other high church officials; that married into the Bonaparte family around the time of the Napoleonic Wars; and which has remained a staple of the so-called "Black nobility" for centuries now. The phrase Black nobility became popular after the Kingdom of Italy defeated papal forces and took Italy in 1870. The Black nobility were the aristocrats who sided with the Pope.

Bizarrely, the army of the Kingdom of Italy was led by another storied family, the House of Savoy. The Dukes of Aosta are a branch of that family. As such, the Borghese and Aosta klans likely crossed swords during 1870. Later, their descendants would struggle for control of the Decima Flottiglia MAS during the Second World War. Indeed, it is likely that X'MAS veterans squared off against one another in the south of Italy after 1943 while the scions of longtime aristocratic rivals commanded both forces.

Prince Aimone, 4th Duke of Aosta, who vied with Borghese for control of the X'MAS
This is one of those instances that makes Recluse suspect that their was something deeper to the creation of modern special operations forces. To further illustrate this point, we now turn the next and even more bizarre example.

Clan Fraser

Of late, this researcher has been struck by just how many storied families in the British establishment were in fact Scottish. Some of these families --the StewartsScotsSinclairsFlemingsKerrs, and Bruces --trace their lineages back to the chieftains of the legendary Scottish clan system. Others like the Keswicks are of a more recent vintage, but no less influential. But perhaps none are more mysterious than Clan Fraser, especially those of Lovat.

It is generally agreed that Clan Fraser had its origins in France, specifically the area of Anjou. That particular province has quite a storied history in its own right. From the late ninth to the early thirteenth century, the territory was ruled by the House of Ingelger. That dynasty produced a King of Jerusalem, Fulk V. This particular monarch was also the grandfather of England's Henry II and great-grandfather of the legendary King Richard the Lionheart. Fulk V was apparently attached to the Knights Templar at one point while his great-grandson sold them the island of Cyprus. I bring this up as the Templars will crop up again in this saga.

Fulk V
But, back to Clan Fraser. The first mention of a Fraser in Scotland occurs in 1160, when a Simon Fraser is listed as owning land in East Lothian. At some point in the twelfth or thirteenth centuries, the family moved to Tweeddale. From there, they spread out across the counties of StirlingAngusInverness, and Aberdeen. For those Secret Sun fans who frequent this blog (and I know you are many), Cocteau Twins front woman Elizabeth Fraser hails from Grangemouth, which is located in Stirling. As such, Liz Fraser is almost surely a distant descendant of the original Clan Fraser. For those of you unfamiliar with the accounts of Liz Fraser published on the Secret Sun, a good starting point can be found here.

Liz Fraser
The Frasers first rose to prominence in Scotland during the Wars of Independence. It was against this backdrop that Sir Simon "the Patriot" Fraser established himself as one of the most noteworthy generals of that particular era. A contemporary of Robert the Bruce and William Wallace, Sir Simon's most noteworthy victory occurred at the Battle of Roslin in 1303. Over a century later, Clan Sinclair would establish the legendary Rosslyn Chapel in the same township. This site has long be associated with legends surrounding the Knights Templar and Freemasonry.

Simon the Patriot's luck ran out in 1306 when he was captured by the British and executed. The Frasers continued fighting, however. Sir Simon's cousin, Sir Alexander Fraser, was present at the famed Battle of Bannockburn, which decisively turned the war in the favor of the Scots. The Battle of Bannockburn has been at the center of much speculative history due to the allegations the Knights Templar assisted the Scots in achieving this crucial victory.


The Battle of Bannockburn unfolded on June 23rd and 24th of 1314, the latter being St. John's Day, a date with much significance in Freemasonry. The Templar knights had been suppressed on a mass scale several years earlier by Papal decree, leading most mainstream historians to dismiss such allegations outright. But things were a little different in Scotland.
"In 1306, the King of Scotland, Robert the Bruce, had been excommunicated by the pope... This meant that he was under no obligation to obey any orders coming from the Holy See. Thus, when the Templars were finally ordered arrested and imprisoned the following year, and their property confiscated and turned over to the Hospitallers, there was no legal requirement for Robert to do the same. In fact, only to Templars were ever arrested in Scotland during the trials and there is no record of their having endured any hardship or punishment. Indeed, the Templars in question were two Englishmen.
"The order was officially disbanded by order of the Pope and 1312... and Jacques de Molay burned at the stake in March 1314. The Battle of Bannockburn took place only three months later. The English had cooperated in the arrest and imprisonment of the Templars and the confiscation of property; the Scots had not. Thus, it is not so far-fetched to believe that some Templars had fled to Scotland to avoid their fate on the Continent and in England, and sided with Robert the Bruce against the English at the famous battle.
"The Templars had, in fact, a long history in Scotland. David I of Scotland had granted some lands to the Templars in the twelfth century, at a town about four miles from present-date Roslin. The earliest known Templar charter is that of the town of St. Andrews, and is dated to 1160. The Templars were not the only military order in Scotland, in fact. The Knights Hospitallers also had property in Scotland. As did the Teutonic Knights. As in France, these holdings provided a source of revenue and recruits for the knightly orders. 
"In 1312 all Templar property in Scotland was granted to the Hospitallers, as was happening throughout Europe. However, there is no record that the Hospitallers actually took advantage of this in Scotland at the time. Indeed, although the two orders were merged legally, they seem to have maintained their separate identities for at least a century to come. We know that, in 1488, James IV of Scotland issued a statement in which he upheld the rights of both the Templars and the Hospitallers, referring to them as separate entities. This documentation implies a close relationship between the Scottish monarchy and the Templars. We do not know if this relationship was based upon common goals and agendas, or was more a reflection of the political (and perhaps economic) reality of the times. Nonetheless, there was a demonstrable Templar presence in Scotland that outlasted the papal edicts."
(The Secret Temple, Peter Levenda, pgs. 59-60)

Against this backdrop lurked Clan Fraser, which would soon rise to the pinnacle of Scottish society. In the aftermath of Bannockburn, Sir Alexander married Robert the Bruce's sister and became the Chamberlain of Scotland, at the time the third most powerful post in the Scottish court. The Frasers of Philorth, one of the most senior of the various modern Fraser clans, trace their lineage from Sir Alexander. It was Alexander's younger brother, one of many Simon Frasers, who would found what is arguably still the most powerful of the Fraser clans. This would be Clan Fraser of Lovat.


The Jacobite Era

Simon "the Fox" Fraser, 11th Lord Lovat was a pivotal figure in the Jacobite uprisings of 1715 and 1745. He was especially infamous for his doubling dealing. After Clan Mackenzie made a play to take over Lovat lands via marriage in the aftermath o the death of the 10th Lord Lovat, Simon the Fox departed for France in 1702. There, he made inroads with the exiled Stuart dynasty and leading Jacobite figures. By 1703, he was already involved with intrigues with the British in an effort to gain the Lovat title. At the time the French court had been supporting the Jacobite cause, and responded by having Simon exiled and then imprisoned. This state of affairs lasted until 1707.

In 1714, Queen Anne  died. This brought to power the First King George and the Hanover dynasty. A Jacobite uprising soon broke out in Scotland. Seeing his chance, Simon the Fox opted to side with the British and was rewarded with the Lovat title and lands after the revolt was put down.

When a second Jacobite uprising broke out in 1745, Lord Lovat opted to side with his countrymen. This proved to be a disastrous decision. The Scots were soundly defeated at the Battle of Culloden. Not long afterwards, Lord Lovat was arrested. After being imprisoned in the Tower of London for a little less than two years, he was executed via beheading on April 9, 1747. Allegedly, he was the last man to be beheaded in Britain. His body was reportedly taken back to a family mausoleum near Inverness, but recent evidence indicates that the body in his casket was one of a young woman. Like Simon the Fox, she was also missing her head. What became of Simon's body, or either's head, remains a mystery.

Simon the Fox, 11th Lord Lovat
As I'm sure many of you are aware, the Jacobites had a close association with a particular branch of Freemasonry as well as it alleged mythological ties to the Knights Templar. For the uninitiated, here's a brief rundown:
"During this time, Masonic lodges had functioned as underground meeting places for Jacobite supporters. While the lodges had struggled to maintain neutrality during the English Civil War the seventeenth century... the bonds brotherhood became more difficult to maintain. Into this romantic atmosphere of espionage, intrigue, and 'pretenders to the throne' stepped one of the major personalities of modern Freemasonry: Chevalier Michael Ramsay.
"Ramsay (1681-1743) was a Scot who had attended the Edinburgh University and the University of Leiden, and received a doctorate in civil law from Oxford University in 1730. For a while he moved in the same pious circles as Johannes Kelpius but, later converting to Catholicism and throwing in his lot with the Jacobites, he wound up in France and then in Rome (in 1724) as the tutor of the young Bonnie Prince Charlie. He was also Mason, and Grand Chancellor of the Paris Grand Lodge. His most lasting contribution to Freemasonry was a speech he made in 1737 in Paris, before a meeting of a Masonic lodge there. What he had to say caused reverberations down through the centuries, and Freemasonry is still struggling to come to terms with the ideas he presented there for the first time.
"In his speech he connected the practice of Freemasonry not with the stonemasons' guilds of medieval Europe but with the nobles who conducted the Crusades in the Holy land. Ramsay claims – without actually mentioning the Knights Templar by name – that the chivalric orders that had operated in Palestine were the direct ancestors of the Freemasons; that their oath was not 'execrable' as have been claimed (and thus immediately connecting these orders with the accusations against the Templars); that they had only the highest ideals; that they recognized each other by passwords and signs in order to differentiate each other from the Saracens; and that later they had merged with the Order of St. John of Jerusalem... According to Ramsey, this is why the lodges were called Lodges of St. John.
"Ramsay was very specific in his speech about which Scottish nobles have been involved in protecting and supporting these Masonic forbears, and used 1286 as the date when the Kilwinning Lodge of Scotland was in operation as the only surviving lodge of the Crusader period.
"In other words, Ramsay claimed that Scotland – and only Scotland – had indisputable Masonic credentials, and he went further to claim that France would become the center of the restored Masonic order.
"The effect of his words was electric. He had single-handedly caused a sensation throughout France that elevated the reputation of Freemasonry and made it is noble as, if not nobler than, existing chivalric orders. Suddenly Freemasonry was no longer about stoneworkers in a quarry but about educated man, nobles, princes, and Crusaders. In his later works, he deliberately links Freemasonry with the Templars: a connection that has yet to be broken, no matter how hard many have tried...
"Thus was the Scottish Rite born."
(The Secret Temple, Peter Levenda, pgs. 101-102)
Chevalier Michael Ramsay
Contrary to what Levenda claims, the only Scottish noble family mentioned in Ramsay's 1737 speech are the Stewarts. Given how widespread and prestigious certain branches of Clan Fraser were, it would hardly be surprising if the Frasers were among those linked to the Templars. This connection could potentially go back to Bannockburn, where the Templars and Clan Fraser were reportedly both present at. Just how close Simon the Fox truly was to the Jacobite cause is highly debatable, but he reportedly took solace in dying a Scottish patriot at the time of his execution.

Another curiosity from this era is worth exploring for a moment: Boleskine House. This particular Scottish manor gained infamy in the twentieth century after being owned by Aleister Crowley and, later, Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page. The residency had originally been constructed as a hunting lodge during the 1760s by Colonel Archibald Campbell Fraser, a son of the 11th Lord of Lovat, Simon the Fox. After Simon's execution, the Lovat clan had lost their lordship, but Fraser's half brother Simon Fraser was still considered to be the Master of Lovat and chief of the Lovat clan. Reportedly, Archibald had originally built Boleskine, which was surrounded by Lovat lands, to annoy his brother due to his support of the English during the 1745 Jacobite uprising.

Archibald Campbell Fraser
When the Master of Lovat died childless in 1786, Archibald succeeded him as Master of Lovat and chieftain of Clan Fraser of Lovat. As such, Archibald ended up with all of the lands surrounding Boleskine in addition to the hunting lodge itself. Archibald would have sons, but ended up out living all of them. Hence, when Archibald died, there was some dispute over whom would succeed him. The honor eventually went to Thomas Alexander Fraser. By this time the titles had already been restored, making Thomas the twelfth Lord Lovat. He also appears to have inherited all of Archibald's lands, including Boleskine.

The twelfth Lord Lovat died in 1875, while Crowley did not purchase Boleskine until 1899. It is known that he procured the lands from the Fraser family, though this researcher has been unable to determine whom exactly. It is most likely that the Boleskine was still in possession of the Lovat branch by the time of Crowley's purchase, however. In his autobiography The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, the Great Beast notes that Lord Lovat was one of his closet neighbors to Boleskine, implying the Lovats still owned much of the surrounding land. It is also likely Crowley knew the Lord Lovat of the time, who would have been fourteenth one.

Boleskine House
It should be noted that Boleskine and the surrounding area already had a reputation for ample high weirdness even before Crowley purchased the property. Legend has it that the lodge was built upon the ruins of a church that had burned down during mass, killing the entire congregation in the process. There were also rumors of tunnels leading from the lodge's cellars to a nearby burial ground. And of course, the property is located right next to the legendary Loch Ness. This is yet another instance of the high weirdness that appears to follow the Frasers around like a shadow.


The Lord of War


For those you wondering what all of this has to do with special operations, your patience will hopefully now be rewarded. As one may have gathered from the preceding account, Clan Fraser of Lovat had a strong warrior ethos that translated into the modern era. The 14th Lord Lovat, neighbor to Aleister Crowley, had founded the Lovat Scouts, which were initially deployed during the above-mentioned Boer War. This researcher has been unable to determine how impressed Lord Lovat was with the Boer's commando tactics, but in the aftermath of that conflict the Lovat Scouts would shift their emphasis to "irregular warfare." 

Like his father and other ancestors, Simon Fraser, 15th Lord Lovat, was a fighting man. He joined the Lovat Scouts in 1930, at a time after that transition to irregular warfare had been made. Later, he served in another elite unit, the Scots Guard. As such, he found himself in a curious position when the Second World War broke out.

Simon Fraser, 15th Lord Lovat
As was noted above, WWII is generally considered to be the conflict that spawned modern special operations forces. And the trailblazers of these units, in turn, was the British Empire. Unable to confront Nazi Germany directly at the onset of the war, the British would lean heavily on commandos and other special operations forces in the early years of the conflict. While such units have never really been tested against a modern military before, the British had one particular Scottish family that was ready to take on the task of creating a new type of commando.

In 1940, Lovat was one of the men charged with setting up a special forces training center to drill the next generation of commandos. He eventually settled upon Inverailort House, which was of course located in Scotland. Lovat and David Stirling, the future founder of the SAS, were the men who settled upon this location. Lovat and Stirling would go on to become major instructors at this school, which was overseen by Bill Stirling, David's older brother.

Inverailort House
Despite the last names, all of these men belonged to Clan Fraser of Lovat. The mother of both David and Bill was Margaret Fraser, the daughter of the 13th Lord Lovat. As such, 15th Lord Lovat and the Stirlings were all cousins. As such, Inverailort House appears to have been very much a family affair.

It also produced many of the leading special operators on the British side of WWII. Two of the most notable were Neil "Billy" McLean, who became one of the leading paramilitary officers in the Special Operations Executive (SOE); and Fitzroy Maclean, another key early figure in both the SOE and SAS, whom married Lovat's sister.


Neil "Billy" McLean (top) and Fitzroy Maclean (bottom)
So, while it may not be totally accurate to say that Clan Fraser of Lovat created the Special Air Services, the world's first modern special operations forces, they were clearly an enormous influence, at a minimum. Nor were these the only special operations forces linked to the Lovats. While the Stirlings were setting up the SAS, Lord Lovat himself would personally command No. 4 Commando and, later, the 1st Special Services Brigade

And then there's the legendary Special Operations Executive. When Churchill commanded that Europe be set ablaze, it was the SOE that was tasked with carrying out this directive. The SOE oversaw virtually all covert operations during WWII for the British rather than MI6, which was largely just an intelligence gathering organization during that conflict. Among the most notably operations of the SOE was Jedburgh (naturally named after a town in Scotland), which carried out sabotage and guerrilla warfare behind enemy lines leading up to the Normandy invasion. More information on the importance of the SOE can be found here and here.

the insignia of the SOE
The training SOE operators received was almost entirely based upon what Lovat and company had cooked up with Inverailort. Indeed, the school there appears to have originally been set up to train the SOE. Lovat himself would eventually take over the SOE as the war was winding down, when he accepted the post of Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, which housed the Ministry of Economic Warfare. It was this curious entity that oversaw the SOE. During this time, he fought to preserve remnants of the SOE, which was under siege by both MI6 and the Foreign Office.

So, to recap: the 15th Lord Lovat pioneered what would now be known as irregular and unconventional warfare, helping train the SOE in these dark arts. And the SOE were generally considered to be the unquestioned masters of such things during WWII. He also trained up and commanded many of the leading commando units during WWII. Elsewhere, his relations and in-laws helped set up the SAS, the first modern special operations forces. Sir David Stirling would later go on to set up Watchguard International, which is generally considered to be the first modern private military company (PMC). Much more information on the murky origins of PMCs will be presented in my forth coming book, including a bit about Colonel Stirling.

Colonel David Stirling
In other words, there doesn't appear to be much linked to modern, non-Naval special operations forces that the Lovats do not crop up in. While the Borghese family no doubt played a role in the creation of Navy SEALS and the like, the influence the Lovat clan had on modern special operations forces is simply unparalleled. It is also mysterious, given the family's potential links to the Knights Templar and Freemasonry.

This researcher is not fond of centuries old conspiracies. Indeed, far from it as this is the type of thing I love debunking. But the presence of long time aristocratic families like the Borghese and Clan Fraser of Lovat at the birth of modern special operations forces is curious, to put it mildly. Throw in the bizarre history of the Lovats, and one is left with quite an enigma. As such, it may not be so surprising to find such an obsession with chivalric orders among modern elite forces.  

And with that, I shall sign off for now readers. If you've made it this far, hopefully you've found my speculation rewarding, or entertaining at the least. Until next time, stay tuned.



Take Me to the Farm

$
0
0


I'm very excited about this most recent podcast. It was a kind of round table discussion with Frank Zero and Jeremy Knight of ZeroKnight and the great Christopher Knowles of The Secret Sun. Frank and Jeremy are of course collaborating with me on my forth coming book while Chris is a legend who has been an enormous influence and inspiration for my own research. Needless to say, I was uber excited for this podcast, as I'm sure my nerves at the onset (and five or so cups of coffee I had had previously) will attest too.

We managed to cover a host of topics in a chat that went just a little over an hour. They included D-Wave, Gordie Rose, Elon Musk, and how credible some of the claims surrounding these entities truly are; cybernetics and its ties to behavior modification experiments; Nick Land, the Cybernetics Culture Research Unit (CCRU), "accelerationism" and the remarkable decree of influence these things have had; Jack Kirby and the potentially arcane influences of his comics; the black oil trope in fiction; Kenneth Grant, his potential ties to Peter Tompkins, and the vast influence he has had on the likes of Peter Levenda and Colonel Michael Aquino; the specter of the mysterious Sovereign Order of Saint John (SOSJ) lurking behind Tompkins and Levenda; SOSJ "interrogation specialists" Cleve Backster; other curious SOSJ knights such as Philip J. Corso, Carl Maria Stanley and fellow travelers such as arch child rapist David Ferrie; fiction depictions of ARTICHOKE and MK-ULTRA.; contemporary paganism; Colonia DignidadEpsteinLe Cercle; and so much more.

The podcast can be found here. A YouTube version with a slideshow can also be found here.

More information on the topics discussed, check some of the following:

The JFK Assassination: A Strange and Terrible Journey series
Bavaria, the Thule Society, the SOSJ, and the Making of a Revolutionary Faith series
The Office of Security: A Tale of Sex, Drugs, and High Weirdness
The Office of Security Meet the Nine Parts One and Two
Fringe: The Strange and Terrible History of the Far Right and High Weirdness series
The Lovecraftian Enlightenment
The Dark Enlightenment and More Mellon Madness

Well, that should be enough to keep those of you just joining the party preoccupied for the time being. Again, I would like to give a big thank you to Frank, Jeremy, and Chris for making this happen. It was great fun and hopefully we'll be able get together for another round table discussion in the near future. I hope everyone enjoys this one as much as I enjoyed recording it. Until next time dear readers, stay tuned.


The Farm and the State of High Weirdness

$
0
0


Christopher Knowles of The Secret Sun and myself were back on the Farm this past Friday with our hosts, Frank Zero and Jeremy Knight of ZeroKnight. Jeremy graciously handled the technical aspects so that the rest of us could gab for nearly an hour an a half. On the whole, I felt the results were quite excellent despite Frank and I having personal stuff that effected our prep and Knowles being a little under the weather. Regardless, this podcast turned out much better than our first effort, which wasn't to shabby in and of itself. This time around, everyone seemed more comfortable together, leading to the chat taking some epic turns.

We started out discussing Andrija Puharich and The Nine, and from there things started to take on a life of their own. The various blue-bloods who backed Puharich were considered, as well as the Pentagon behavior modification program he cut his teeth in. Knowles addressed Puharich's old stomping grounds of Maine and all of the strange stuff that was going on in the surrounding area, as well as the mysterious Rear Admiral Herbert B. Knowles (no relation to Chris). Naturally, I found time to expound on the differences between ARTICHOKE and MK-ULTRA. From there, Chris started to breakdown some of the more Nine-centric Hollywood productions, most notably the Star Trek franchise (especially The Original Series and The Animated Series) and the original The Outer Limits. Naturally, the creators of these two franchises, Gene Roddenberry and Leslie Stevens respectively, got a lot of air time as well.

Puharich
From there, Frank delved into some of the mysterious tropes that appeared in the cartoons we kids from the 1980s and 1990s grew up with. I then started to break down the murky origins of the Association of Former intelligence Officers and its sinister Las Vegas chapter. This led to a discussion of the Las Vegas shooting of 2017, To the Stars Academy, and the sinister Mellon family of Pittsburgh. Things wrapped up with Chris and I discussing Lovecraft and what he may have been up to during his numerous journeys across the US. I also found the time to elaborate on the occult significance of the atomic explosion at Trinity.

All in all, pretty epic. The chat can be found here. Please check it out and like it. We'd like to make these chats a regular thing if the interest is there. Certainly, they're a lot of fun for us and here's hoping you guys are enjoying them as well.

For more information on the topics discussed, it is recommended you listen to the first podcast as this one builds off of the earlier one.

Also of interest:

Also of interest is the classic Lucifer's Technologies series on the Secret Sun that largely inspired my fringe series.

A big thank you again to Chris, Frank, and Jeremy for making these chats possible. And with that, I shall sign off for now. Until next time dear readers, stay tuned.


Discussing the Process on Up is Down

$
0
0


Making the podcast rounds again, this time on the Up is Down with Dean Reiner. This week's chat was mostly centered around this infamous Process Church of the Final Judgment. This was a fun chat for me in no small part because it allowed me to provide new information on the the Process, which I hadn't previously covered directly for a number of years. Over time, I've had to rethink my views somewhat on this entity.

In relation to the Process, we discuss the Malayan Emergency and the birth of modern counterinsurgency doctrine; the Profumo Affair; the Mayfair Set, their links to a plot destabilize the British government during the late 1960s-early 1970s, and their long-term influence on Brexit; the curious places where the Process turned up; Thomas Jude Baumler and the enigmatic "Bishop" Carl Maria Stanley; the Sovereign Order of Saint John; Manson and the Process; the overlap between the Process, Manson, and the far right; their ties with the alleged Son of Sam cult; the support given to Maury Terry by Rupert Murdoch; the terrible fate of the Process children; and so much more.

The podcast can be found here.

For more information of the topics discussed, check the following:

The Process: A Strange and Terrible Journey
Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Part Four

On Baumler and Stanley:
The JFK Assassination: A Strange and Terrible Saga Part VII

On Manson and the Far Right:
Man's Son or the Children of the Sun

On the Son of Sam cult and Profumo
Goodfellas Part VII: Sons of Cohn

On the Mayfair Set







As always dear readers, I hope that you enjoy. Until next time, stay tuned.


The Cecil Mysteries and Other Crowley Musings

$
0
0


"History teaches: never trust a Cecil"
-British proverb

Making my second appearance on Auticulture this year with the great Jasun Horsley. This was an incredibly fun chat that covered a host of topics. A few subjects have become fairly common around these parts over the past few weeks --the Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO) and the participants in the bizarre Las Vegas chapter, including Peter Levenda, Richard Doty, Colonel John Alexander, and Colonel Michael Aquino; To the Stars Academy; Kenneth Grant and the Typhonian tradition; the mysterious Sovereign Order of Saint John and Christian Identity "theology"Jeffrey Epstein and neo-reaction.

However, about midway through we engaged in a discussion of Aleister Crowley and some of his more curious affiliates. I was quite pleased with this section as I felt this may provide a bit of a novel context to Crowley. I haven't written on Crowley much on this blog over the years in no small part because I didn't feel like I had much to add on the topic that many others haven't already said better. But after doing a little research on the Great Beast prior to this chat with fresh eyes, I began making some very curious connections, especially as it relates to the mysterious Cecil family.

As such, I thought I might try a bit of a multimedia approach to this interview. The podcast in question can be found here. And below, you will find more of a "classic" VISUP blog detailing much of the information discussed in the latter half of this interview, plus a few things I uncovered after the interview. It is highly recommended that the reader precedes below, as this is quite a fascinating topic.

Unfortunately, I wasn't able to do more on the topic of Charles Manson, having become a bit obsessed with the Crowley/Cecil connection leading up to the podcast. Hopefully, that's out of my system now after this chat with Jasun and hammering out this post. I'm about to embark on some new research on Manson in preparation for Jasun's upcoming appearance on The Farm with Frank Zero, Jeremy Knight, and myself. That should be happening in about two weeks and it will hopefully be every bit as epic as this chat was.

The Cecil Family

The Cecil family has been one of the most powerful and influential in British society for nearly five hundred years. The man who turned it into a generations spanning dynasty is William Cecil, 1st Baron Burghley. Cecil was one of the most powerful figures within the court of Elizabeth I, serving twice as as her secretary of stateLord Privy Seal, and Lord High Treasurer. What's more, while Francis Walsingham tends to get the credit as Elizabeth's spymaster (and the de facto founder of MI6), he ultimately worked for Cecil.. Upon Walsingham's death, Cecil firmly took over much of the Elizabethan spy networks. Naturally, Cecil also had an interest in the mystical. He bestowed patronage upon alchemy and corresponded with John Dee, among other things.

family patriarch William Cecil
The tradition of espionage was carried on by William's younger son from his second marriage, the hunchbacked Robert Cecil, 1st Earl of Salisbury. Robert inherited his father's spy network, and became intelligence chief of King James I. There has been much suspicion over the years concerning the role he played in the Gunpowder Plot.

It is the descendants of Robert --the Salisbury line --that he remained a preeminent power in England for centuries. In The Anglo-American Establishment, the always controversial Carroll Quigley described the family's influence as "all-pervasive in British life since 1886" (pg. 15). Per Quigley, the family's continual influence was due to three factors: (a) a triple-front penetration of politics, journalism, and education; (b) the recruitment of men of ability and linking them to the Cecil family via marriage, titles, and positions of power; and (c) Cecils and their allies being in positions that are shielded as much as possible from the public gaze.

Some of the leading families that have intermarried with the Cecils include the Grosvenors (Dukes of Westminster), the Balfours, Palmers (the Earls of Selborne), and the Cavendishs (who hold multiple titles). These families, along with other associated allies, formed what Quigley dubbed the "Cecil Bloc," though it may be more apt to say these families comprised the historic aristocracy that has ruled England for centuries. The Grosvenors and especially the Cavendishs have wielded tremendous power for any number of years as well.

Throughout much of the twentieth century, the Cecils would be linked to various subversive political movements. Quigley describes the infamous Milner Group/Round Table movement as beginning as "a major fief" within the Cecil Bloc. These cabals/movements of course spawned the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), both longtime bugaboos of the conspiratorial right.





Quigley alleges that the Milner Group eventually took over the Cecil Bloc, though leaves this open to debate throughout The Anglo-American Establishment. He raises the possibility "that the split which appeared within the Conservative Party in England after 1923 followed roughly the lines between the Milner Group and the Cecil Bloc" (pg. 30). He later acknowledges that the Milner Group "was surely less powerful than the Cecil Bloc, even as late as 1929..." and that "when they disagreed, the views of the Milner Group did not usually prevail" (pg. 230). Quigley notes that the Milner Group's influence went into decline after 1938, giving them a fairly brief reign if they did in fact overcome the Cecil Bloc after 1929.

Fundamentally, the Cecil Bloc was conservative to its core while the Milner Group had a more progressive point of view (relatively speaking). Essentially, the Cecil Bloc wanted to preserve the Empire and its peculiar way of life. The Milner Group wanted to expand these things to the world at large. This led to fundamental differences on foreign policy, especially in regards to India (most notably in regards to self determination) and a United Europe. The Group vigorously supported the former and tentatively the later until after 1918. The Bloc was never very enthusiastic about either, and indeed the Cecils would later become staunch foes of the European Union, as we shall see.

Alfred Milner, the longtime head of the Round Table movement
What united the two factions was an unwavering belief in the glory of the British Empire and its preservation, even if they differed on the best means of achieving this. Given that the Cecil family still appears to be going strong while the political project of the Group has been completely co-opted by the America-centric CFR, another possibility should be considered: That the Cecils were using the Milner clique throughout the early twentieth century to appeal to idealistic types from the right sort of background. After the Group was discredited due to its policy of appeasement leading up to WWII, the Cecils cast it aside and reverted to their traditional political agenda: the British Empire.

Throughout the mid and latter half of the twentieth century, the Marquesses of Salisbury would embrace an increasingly far right political agenda bent of preserving the Empire and opposing the EU. They also found the time to help launch a particularly elitist form of Christianity that would be embraced by curious cults around the world in the second half of that century.

It all goes back to Frank Buchman one of the most powerful, and little acknowledged, evangelicals in the US and UK throughout much of the twentieth century. During the late 1920s, he set up the Oxford Group at the famed British college barring the Group's name. As World War II approached, the Group was rechristened the Moral Re-Armament movement (MRA). Through these organizations, Buchman was able to craft a very elitist and cultish approach to Christianity that would have a profound reach in the postwar years. Buchman called for "a new social order under the dictatorship of the Spirit of God." In practical terms, this meant courting powerful men in positions of influence. This would usher in a "God-controlled nation" that would bring an end to labor strife, then an overriding concern in the 1930s, among other things. Wealth would of course not be redistributed, but workers could take solace in the fact that the robber barons were no longer driven by greed, but God.

Frank Buchman
Among two of Buchman's favorite tools were what he dubbed "soul surgery" and house parties. Both were centered around confession. The former consisted of surrendering to God by cutting out sin one incision at a time. This frequently involved confession to Buchman and his confessors. Whether this was a path to God is debatable, but it certainly gave Buchman and company access to the darkest secrets of the elite they courted. Buchman's house parties operated on a similar basis:
"... The most successful events took place at one of the estates around the world that Buchman used as outreach stations. He had won the allegiance of a number of wealthy widows and heiresses and neglected wives of businessman, and they regularly showered him with riches, including their great homes, to which Buchman would invite select groups for a day in the country. There would be tennis and golf and some praying, and then the group would gather for the party. A fire would be built, the lights dimmed, and Buchman or a trained confessor might begin with some minor transgression, a traffic ticket, a youthful prank. Another Buchman veteran might than up the ante. 'Some lad might now turn evidence against a governess or an upstairs maid,' observed a New Yorker writer in 1932. And from there it was on to the weaknesses that afflict not just college boys but also the grand dames who flocked to Buchman and the big men they dragged in their wake, all stumbling over one another in elaborate description of their private perversions, how they had been blinded to their purpose in life by sexual desire, and how 'Guidance' had saved them. Around circle they went, spurring one another on."
(The Family, Jeff Sharlet, pg. 128)
According to veteran CIA officer Miles Copeland in his The Game Player, Buchman's movement was courted by the CIA in the postwar years for the type of access the house parties and such like offered. He notes that "the arrangement we made with Moral Rearmament that gave us useful secret channels right into the minds of leaders not only in Africa and Asia but also Europe" (pg. 177). Unsurprisingly, the MRA would serve as the foundation of elite, intelligence-aligned Christian cults such as the Unification Church and The Family. The Unification Church shall be dealt with below, while much more information on The Family can be found here.

Of course, the Cecils had already latched onto Buchman's movement well before the CIA was even created. The Fourth Marquess of Salisbury was a member of Buchman's Oxford Group by at least the late 1930s. Even as controversy would begin to engulf Buchman's group in the mid-1930s (due in no small part to his support of dictatorship and fascism), Lord Salisbury would continue to support Buchman, even arranging for a media blitz so as to give Buchman a platform to defend his movement.

James Gascoyne-Cecil, 4th Marquess of Salisbury
This was just the beginning of the involvement of the Salisburys in far right politics during the 20th century. As the great David Teacher notes in the long-suppressed Rogue Agents, the Fifth Marquess of Salisbury was the president of the far right Monday Club from its founding in 1961 until his death in 1972. The Monday Club was imperialistic to the hilt, forming in the wake of Prime Minister Harold Macmillan's liberal drift in regards to the Empire. With the whiff of decolonization in the air, the Monday Club organized to continue white rule in Rhodesia and South Africa and the destruction of Nasser. Salisbury was ahead of the curve, having resigned in 1957 from Macmillan's cabinet and as leader of the House of Lords over the government's liberal drift.

Upon his death his son, the 6th Marquess of Salisbury, would take up the presidency of the Monday Club and hold it until 1981. During his tenure, the group took on an increasingly anti-EU and anti-immigration stance. Teacher also notes that, by the 1980s, this Salisbury had also become a participant in the highly secretive Le Cercle, which is part the far right's answer to Bilderberg and part a vast private intelligence network, deeply implicated in drug and arms trafficking, stay-behind armies, and VIP child sex networks. For more on the nefarious outfit, check here and here.


the 5th (top) and 6th (bottom) Marquesses of Salisbury
The 7th Marquess of Salisbury also had links to the Cercle complex via one of its many front groups, the Belgian-based Institut Européen pour la Paix et la Sécurité (IEPS, see Rogue Agents, pg. 221). Naturally, the current Lord Salisbury is a longstanding eurosceptic. He has been actively campaigning against the EU since at least the late 1990s and is a staunch supporter of Brexit.

The Round Table movement, Moral Re-Armament movement, the Monday Club, Le Cercle, Brexit --there should be no question that the Marquesses of Salisbury have continued to wield tremendous power and influence over the political life of the UK and beyond even as they've receded from the public gaze (which apparently has been a time honored strategy of the family, excluding the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury) since the early twentieth century. It was during the long reign of the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury as Prime Minister, allegedly during the apex of the family's power (per Quigley), that the Cecils interceded on behalf of Crowley.


the Cecils, Crowley, and the SPR


The Cecils may well have had a longstanding interest in mysticism. As was noted above, patriarch William Cecil was a patron of alchemy. It would appear that this interest became more pronounced during the late nineteenth century with the rise of the Salisbury line. In The Anglo-American Establishment, Quigley notes: "One of the enduring creations of the Cecil Bloc is the Society for Psychical Research, which holds a position in the history of the Cecil Bloc similar to that held by the Royal Institute of International Affairs in the Milner Group" (pgs. 31-32). 

The Society for Psychical Research (SPR) was one of the first institutions that attempted to "scientifically" study psi and paranormal phenomenon. The legacy of the Milner Group then is centered around a political think tank, the Cecil Bloc an organization to investigate the paranormal. That says a lot about the world view of these two factions.


But how directly was the Cecil family itself involved with SPR? Quigley links it more to the Balfour family. Both Arthur Balfour, a future prime minister (and the man who issued the infamous Balfour Declaration), and his brother Gerald served as presidents of the SPR at various times. But in addition to being Balfours, the brothers Arthur and Gerald were also Cecils. Their mother was Lady Blanche Cecil, daughter of the 2nd Marquess of Salisbury and sister to Third, one of the UK's longest serving prime ministers. What's more, Quigley alleges that Arthur Balfour effectively took over the Cecil Bloc after the death of the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury. This likely would not have occurred had the Cecils doubted Balfour's dedication to their legacy. As such, the SPR clearly had support from portions of the Cecil family itself.

As for Crowley, the Great Beast had a curious relationship with both the Cecil family and the SPR. As to the former, it was no less than the 3rd Marquess of Salisbury who recommended Crowley to Cambridge. He made this recommendation when he was a sitting prime minister to boot.

Consider the implication of this for a moment dear reader. Lord Salisbury was not merely Britain's prime minister, he was also the head of the Cecil Bloc. If Quigley is to be believed (and that is always debatable), the Bloc was effectively the preeminent political power of the day. Combine this with the historic influence the Lords of Salisbury have wielded for centuries and one is left with the distinct possibility that Lord Salisbury was at the time the most powerful figure in the ENTIRE British Empire. This, dear readers, is the man who recommended Aleister Crowley to Cambridge University. Let that sink in for a moment if you will.

Robert Gascoyne-Cecil, 3rd Marquess of Salisbury and one of the Britain's longest serving prime ministers
The question then becomes, how did Crowley manage such a feat? In The Confessions of Aleister Crowley, the Great Beast attributes the intervention of Lord Salisbury on his behalf to his aunt's involvement in the Primrose League. This was an organization geared towards spreading conservative principals on behalf of the Tories.

pins worn by members of the Primrose League
While Crowley's family was fairly well to do, much of their fortune was based upon the family brewery, Crowley's Alton Alehouses. While this business was quite profitable, it was also the type of industry that was still looked down upon by the traditional British aristocracy during this era. Even the Great Beast himself seemed somewhat embarrassed by the source of his family fortune. What then would a man like Lord Salisbury make of a brewer's second cousin? Likely he would have been perceived as petty bourgeoisie, at best.

But keep in mind that the Cecil family maintained its historic power by recruiting men of ability into its ranks. Crowley was already an accomplished mountain climbers by this point and undeniably brilliant. This may well have made someone take notice.

Another potential clue is provided by the career Crowley had hoped to use Cambridge as a stepping stone for: namely, in the diplomatic service. Incidentally, this type of work has often gone hand in glove with spy craft as well. Indeed, diplomatic cover is a time honored tradition among spooks. And that is why Crowley's involvement in the Society for Psychical Research at Cambridge is so curious. Consider one of the individuals he encountered in the SPR at Cambridge:
"Another man who enjoyed intrigue was the Hon. Francis Henry Everard Joseph Feilding (1867-1936). Finding Catholicism inadequate to cope with grief at his sister's death, Feilding joined the Society for Psychical Research (SPR) in 1895. Established at Trinity in 1882, the SPR investigated scientifically 'psychical' phenomena: mediumship, telepathy, ghosts and life after death. Feilding, SPR secretary from 1903, was also an intelligence officer. If anyone recruited Crowley for secret service at Cambridge or elsewhere, or at a later date, Everard Feilding, Crowley's senior by eight years, must be a prime candidate.
"A 15-year-old midshipman in the Royal Navy during the Egyptian campaign of 1882, Feilding was admitted to Trinity in 1887. Called to the Bar in 1894, he served on the Committee of Naval Censors (Press Bureau) during the Great War, and afterward, with the rank of Lieutenant RNVR, in the Special Intelligence Department of Egypt. In a career move similar to that which launched the legend of Lawrence of Arabia, Feilding was lent to the Arab Bureau and the Foreign Office for political service in Syria. After the war, he received the OBE, as well as the Order of the Nile and Order of El Nahda for services in Egypt and the Hejaz. Feilding was Crowley's intelligence contact when, during the Great War, the Beast spied on the German propaganda machine in New York."
(Aleister Crowley: The Biography, Tobias Churton, pg. 33) 
Everard Feilding is the figure looming over the priest
Was Crowley then being groomed to be a spy? This is certainly a distinct possibility, especially in light of some of the activities the Beast got up to while attending Cambridge. During the New Year's Eve of 1896, Crowley found himself in the Swedish capital of Stockholm. There he alleged to have had one of his first significant mystical experiences and to have been initiated into an outfit known as the "Military Order of the Temple."

Some researchers such as Tobias Churton have suggested that Crowley had his first homosexual encounter in Stockholm as well. This is rather debatable, however. Crowley was a product of the British empire-building public school system that has a longstanding reputation for buggery and pederasty. The implications of the Stockholm experience are curious, however.

The Knights Templar, which the "Military Order of the Temple" is clearly a play upon, were accused of buggery. This particular "initiation" may be an allusion to that allegation. As homosexuality was still quite illegal and taboo in British society at the time, there is a possibility that this was an attempt to build a control file on Crowley for latter use.

Sweden was also the gateway to Russia, then considered the greatest threat to the British Empire. "Incidentally," Crowley would later turn up in Saint Petersburg several months later, in the summer of 1897. One could conclude then that things must have gone very well indeed in Stockholm.

Still, this does not quite explain the Cecil family's curious patronage of Crowley. One possible explanation entails the Great Beast "kissing" the right "ring" in public school. Crowley attended Eastbourne, which was founded by the above-mentioned Cavendish family. The Cavendishs themselves are quite a longtime powerhouse among the British aristocracy and of course intermarried with the Cecils. The ties between the Cavendish clan and Crowley's alma mater are close to the point that the school adopted the stag from the family's coat of arms for its emblem. The possibility that Crowley serviced someone sufficiently to extract favor from the chief of the Cecil Bloc can not be discounted.

Boney and the ABN

Another curious I figure I discussed with Jasun was the mysterious Major General J.F.C. "Boney" Fuller. Boney was both a brilliant military strategist and an early Crowley-ite. The two men had first encountered one another at some point during the first decade of the twentieth century. Fuller would soon become one of the Great Beast's most enthusiastic supporters. He penned The Star in The West: A Critical Essay Upon the Works of Aleister Crowley and became a co-founder of the A∴A∴, Crowley's magical order. Reportedly, their relationship began to sour towards the end of the decade due concerns by Fuller that Crowley's bisexuality may effect his military career (clearly, the control file was not working by this point, if ever).

"Boney" Fuller
Contact between the two men was scarce after 1911, but Fuller would continue to have an interest in the occult. During the 1930s, he also became enamored with fascism. He joined the British Union of Fascists (BUF) and became one the closet allies of founder Sir Oswald Mosley.

Prior to setting up the BUF, Mosley had been seen as a rising star within the Conservative Party. In 1920 he had married Lady Cynthia Curzon. Mosley was apparently quite taken with the women of the Curzon family as he later carried on an affair with Lady Cynthia's younger sister, Lady Alexandra Curzon, and their stepmother, Grace Curzon. Grace's husband and the father of Cynthia and Alexandra was Lord George Curzon. Per Quigley, Curzon's was not just Lord Salisbury's former private secretary, but his protege. Curzon would continue to be linked to the Cecil Bloc up until the time of his death in 1925. As such, Mosley effectively married into the Bloc.

Lord George Curzon
How closely the Curzons were to the Bloc after Lord Curzon's death is debatable. Both Mosley and Lady Cynthia had joined Labour in 1924, shortly before Lord Curzon shed his mortal coil. Given the longstanding association the Cecils have with the Conservative Party, it is difficult to discern how this move would have been perceived. Mosley of course later drifted to fascism, but said ideology appears to have enjoyed greater support among the Cecil Bloc's frenemies in the Milner Group. Further muddying the waters are the simultaneous affairs Lady Alexandra was carrying out in the years leading up to WWII with Mosley and Lord Halifax, a leading figure in the Milner Group by that time. 
Oswald Mosley
On the other hand, another leading figure in the British fascist movement was Philip Farrer, a British intelligence officer during WWI who had served as the 4th Marquess of Salisbury's private secretary during the late 1930s. Fuller himself regularly collaborated with Farrer. At a minimum then, the Cecils appear to have been keeping an eye on Mosley's actions. And it was into this maelstrom that Fuller boldly plunged. 

This would open doors for Fuller in the broader fascist movement. He would establish close ties with the German General Stuff during the 1930s, who were greatly influenced by his concepts concerning mechanized warfare. Fuller was the only foreigner present during Nazi Germany's first armored maneuvers in 1935 and was in attendance during Hitler's 50th birthday bash in 1939. 

Fuller had even more extensive ties to various fascist organizations and regimes, which did not lead to his detention at the outbreak of war.
"... Admitted to Oswald Mosley's inner circle, Fuller visited both Mussolini and Hitler. He was also a founding member of the pre-war Nordic League (known initially as the White Knights of Britain or the Hooded Men) which had been established by Nazi agents run by Alfred Rosenberg. Its activities, which were directed from Berlin, included providing an insider's view of the British elite. Fuller had also written intelligence reports on British organizations and individuals for Goebbels, the head of the Nazi propaganda department, and Heinrich Himmler, chief of the SS. It is said that Fuller would have been made ministry of defense if Mosley had come to power, and was regarded by the Nazis as a possible 'Quisling.' Despite the fact that MI5 had him under surveillance, when war came he and his Polish wife were not among the more than seven hundred BUF supporters detained under the 18b regulations. Even Mosley was puzzled by this omission. One possible reason, which would explain a great deal, was that Fuller was an MI6 agent and thus protected."
(MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty's Secret Intelligence Service, Stephen Dorril, pgs. 441-442)

Indeed, it is the only really plausible explanation as to why the British authorities did not feel the need to intern a man who had celebrated Hitler's birthday with the Fuhrer on the eve of war. Throw in Fuller's close collaborator, Philip Farrer, and one is left with the distinct impression that these men were managing the British fascist movement on behalf of the intelligence services. Given the rampant support for fascism among the British aristocracy during the 1930s, the involvement of Fuller and Farrer may not have begun as an intelligence op, but as war with Germany became inevitable it likely became one.

It was during Fuller's time moonlighting for Nazi intelligence services that he encountered a most curious organization.
" 'Boney' Fuller... had been active among the Ukrainian nationalist before the war and among the Ukrainian communities in both Britain and Germany after the war. In the mid-thirties, around the same time as MI6 was recruiting the Banderites in the OUN, the Ukrainian émigré community in London have been penetrated by German Intelligence. This had been undertaken with the help Fuller to ensure Anglo-German 'understanding.' He thought that Hitler's greatest mistake during the war have been to treat the Ukrainians as subhuman, Untermenschen, thus ignoring the military potential of the nationalists. With the support of his good friend Richard Stokes, at the end of the war Fuller had helped assist one of the leading figures in the OUN-B, Jaroslav Stetsko, and maintained contacts with the Ukrainian nationalists and the DP camps throughout the forties. By 1950, Fuller was seventy-one, a wizened old man but still active, calling for a moral as well as a physical and economic campaign against the Bolsheviks and the Soviet Union."
(MI6: Inside the Covert World of Her Majesty's Secret Intelligence Service, Stephen Dorril, pg. 442) 
OUN stands for Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists. The OUN-B was an especially militant branch of the OUN centered around Stepan Bandera. This outfit was an on again, off again Quisling that eventually founded the infamous Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA). The UPA was eventually embraced by the Nazis and received training from famed commando Otto Skorzeny. This effectively transformed then into a stay-behind unit that was used to harass the Red Army as the Nazis retreated in what was known as Operation Sunflower. The OUN/UPA managed to tie down some 200,000 Soviet troops and kill over 7000 officers, per the great Christopher Simpson in his classic Blowback (pgs. 162-163).

The OUN/UPA was fanatically anti-Semitic, anti-Communist, and generally anti-Russian to the hilt. They are considered to be the inspiration behind the modern, neo-Nazi paramilitary outfit known as the Azov Battalion.


In the postwar years, the US an UK viewed the OUN-B/UPA as idea candidates to infiltrate behind Soviet lines so as to carry out sabotage operations. Back in the West, many former OUN-B/UPA members cultivated the far right. The leading figure among the Ukrainians was the above-mentioned Yaroslav Stetsko.

Stetsko
 He was the longtime head of the far right emigre outfit known as the Anti-Bolshevik Bloc of Nations  (ABN). As I've noted before here, the ABN had its origins in Nazi Germany, being comprised of many of the most militant Eastern European "Quisling" outfits. Many of its components were guilty of horrendous war crimes during WWII. Naturally, the US and UK felt that the ABN could serve as the backbone for efforts to pry Eastern Europe out of the Soviet bloc. These efforts largely failed, but the ABN would go on to wield enormous power in the West through a later organization it helped co-found known as the World Anti-Communist League (WACL). The WACL in turn had extensive ties to both Western and Eastern intelligence services, international drug traffickers and various terror networks. Much more information on the WACL can be found here.


For our purposes here, it is also interesting to note the frequency of cults and secret societies within the WACL. The Asian component had its origins in an outfit known as the Asian People's Anti-Communist League (APACL). The guiding forces behind the APACL were South Korea, Japan, and Taiwan. The Japanese and Taiwanese components were deeply linked to the Yakuza and Green Gang, respectively. Both were organized crime syndicates and secret societies. As for South Korea, much of the support for the APACL (and later WACL) came from the Unification Church, the above-mentioned cult that grew out of Moral Re-Armament movement. The Unification Church also enjoyed longstanding ties to the KCIA, for years South Korea's principal intelligence service. More on these cretins can be found here.

The APACL was hardly the only component to feature secret societies and cults, however. One of the most powerful organizations within the Latin American section was a Mexican secret society known as Los Tecos ("the Owls"). The Tecos enjoyed close links with both Mexican security services and drug cartels. During the 1970s and 1980s, they helped raise the so-called White Brigades to destabilize the nation. More on the Tecos, which have at times been likened to a cult, can be found here.

Nor was the Ukrainian section of the ABN the only outfit to rub elbows with a noted occultist. The Romanian section was mainly comprised of veterans of the Iron Guard. During the WWII era, the Guard maintained links with Italian occultist and philosopher Julius Evola. Indeed, there has been some speculation that Evola was the Guard's liaison with Nazi intelligence. The Guardists would later have an influence on the structure of Los Tecos while other Evola-ites crop up among the Italian partners of the League. Much more information on this topic can be found here.

Evola
As such, it is hardly surprising to find a former Crowley acolyte rubbing shoulders with the OUN-B faction of the ABN. It is especially curious that Boney had ties to the OUN-B going back to the 1930s, around the same time Evola was working with the Iron Guard in Romania. When the ABN got going in 1943, the Ukrainian and Romanian sections may well have had some curious mystical discussions. In fairness though, it should also be noted that Yaroslav Stetsko also met with the Moral Re-Armament types at some point as well. But then again, if the Cecil family was lurking behind both Crowley and the MRA, this is not entirely surprising.

Boney, Evola-ites, the Tecos, the Unification Church, the Yakuza --the WACL certainly featured an incredible cast of occultists, secret societies, and cults in its midst. In addition to being the visible face of the Fascist International during the 1970s and 1980s, it may have housed a kind of Black Order within its inner circle as well. Certainly, its affiliates had many curious interests --just consider the New Age pursuits of the Unification Church, for instance.

And with that, I shall sign off for now dear readers. As always, I hope everyone enjoys the chat and has found this supplemental material to be compelling. Stay tuned until next time.

Kingdoms of the Radio

$
0
0


A few weeks ago, the great Christopher Knowles of The Secret Sun emailed this most curious account by legendary DJ John Peel describing an incident that unfolded in Dallas, Texas in the immediate aftermath of the Kennedy assassination. At the time, the British Peel had been living in the Dallas area while working as a DJ and for an insurance company. Somehow, Peel was able to convince Dallas police that he was a journalist working for the Liverpool Echo. This bought him a ringside seat for Lee Harvey Oswald's first appearance as Kennedy's alleged assassin before the press. Also present for this event was Oswald's future assassin (as in two days later), Dallas nightclub owner Jack Ruby.

This is quite a bizarre "coincidence" on any number of levels. For one, there is Peel's fondness for underage girls. This was a "taste" that Peel reportedly first developed while residing in the Dallas area. After Beatlemania broke out in earnest during early 1964 (only a few months after the assassination), Peel described the scene as thus:
"I was suddenly confronted by this succession of teenage girls who didn't want to know anything about me at all. All they wanted me to do was to abuse them, sexually, which, of course, I was only too happy to do."
Jack Ruby is on the far left while Peel is on the far right
Charming. It is also curious in light of some of the activities Ruby was involved in in the Dallas area around this same timeframe. Ruby was actively involved with the Syndicate. As I detailed before here, Ruby's nightclub in Dallas (and one he was alleged to own in Louisiana called the Silver Slipper) were used as hubs for a sexual slavery racket spread across the Gulf states of Louisiana, Texas, and Florida. A collection of prostitutes were ferried by various Syndicate figures across these states, constituting a kind of traveling harem. This researcher has not been able to determine whether any of the women in this ring were teenagers, but this would hardly be surprising. Several of the Cubans active in this ring were also linked to arch child abuser David Ferrie, and had even been used to intimidate his victims and their families in the New Orleans area at one point (more information of Ferrie's sexual outrages can be found here).

David Ferrie
As an interesting side note, there is also curious twilight language present in the allegations relating to the Wizard of Oz. The highly controversial James Shelby Downard and Michael A. Hoffman have long speculated on the Wizard symbolism present in the assassination via Ruby (ruby slippers) and Oswald (Oz-wald). However, in the original novel the slippers were not ruby, they were silver. And it just so happens, Jack Ruby owned a night club in Louisiana called the Silver Slipper. But moving along.


The curious figure who ties all of this together is fellow DJ and media baron Gordon McLendon. McLendon is considered to be one of the pioneers of Top 40 programming and pirate radio. One of Peel's earliest radio gigs involved working for McLendon's famed KLIF station as its "official" Beatles correspondent. Reportedly, McLendon also had ties to the even more legendary Radio London, the off-shore pirate station that provided Peel with his first big break when he returned to the UK in 1967.

As was noted above, it was during this time that Peel first developed a taste for underage girls. This ultimately resulted in him marrying a 15-year-old Texas girl in 1965. Not long afterwards, they fled to Oklahoma "just ahead of [the] police." Two years later, Peel would end up back in the UK working for the McLendon-backed Radio London.

As should come as little surprise, McLendon had a deep background. Before breaking into the entertainment biz, McLendon cut his teeth working for the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) during the Second World War. There also indications that McLendon had ties to the Syndicate in the Dallas area. The great Peter Dale Scott in Deep Politics and the Death of JFK notes that McLendon was one of Ruby's six "closet friends" in the Dallas area and that he turned up in the saga of Candy Barr, a Syndicate-linked stripper and prostitute who had relations with both Ruby and LA godfather Mickey Cohen.

Candy Barr
Scott, who interviewed McLendon in 1977, alleged that he still had impeccable intelligence ties well into the 1960s, if not beyond. One of them was infamous CIA officer David Atlee Phillips, a man long believed by various JFK assassination researchers to have played a leading role in the plot against Kennedy. Per Scott, after Phillips "retired" from the CIA, he went into business with fellow Texan McLendon. Later, they would set up the Association of Former Intelligence Officers (AFIO) together in the mid-1970s. The AFIO is a powerful, right-leaning body that appears to have been one of the leading forces behind the US intelligence community for decades now. It first cut its teeth in Chile during the mid-1970s when Pinochet came to power. My forth coming book will deal with the potential ties between the AFIO and Colonia Dignidad, a haven for deprivations of all kinds, including the sexual abuse of children.

David Atlee Phillips
In more recent years the AFIO, or more precisely the Las Vegas chapter, has been linked to different types of intrigues. Specifically, appears to be managing the UFO research community through figures such as Peter Levenda, "former" Air Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) officer Richard Doty, Colonel John Alexander, and Colonel Michael Aquino. I recently discussed these developments at length with Jasun Horsley of Auticulture. Curiously, Levenda was also involved with the same bizarre church that ordained arch child rapist David Ferrie. What's more, the Cubans used to intimidate Ferrie's victims in New Orleans (and linked to Ruby's Silver Slipper) were said to have ties to Phillips.


The AFIO is certainly a curious entity. As such, it is quite striking that a future co-founder was active in Peel's early career. While this researcher has found no indications that McLendon knew Peel when he found his way to Oswald's press conference, there can be little doubt that Peel was in his employment when he began his escapades with teenage girls. Peel was then able to move around the country, despite having married a 15 year-old in 1965, with little concern over the legal consequences. When things finally did get a little hot in the States, he effortlessly returned to the UK, got a job at another radio station linked to McLendon, and would continue his peculiar appetites unabated for decades to come.

This isn't to suggest that Peel was wholly a creation of McLendon. Surely he had other backers. But Peel does make another curious addition to this sinister network lurking behind the JFK assassination that appears to have become gradually incorporated into the AFIO's network by the 1970s. McLendon's own contributions to the creation of modern radio in the US and Europe, in addition to his patronage of Peel (possibly the most famous DJ in the world by the end of the 20th century) shows that this network's influence on popular culture was none inconsiderate, in addition to its other activities.

What's more, the profound influence that Texas had on the development of rock 'n roll is tremendous, if little understood. The "pirate stations" that McLendon launched from there were instrumental in introducing both "black music" and early rock to a wide ranging audience across the United States. A few years later, one of the earliest psychedelic scenes in the US would emerge in Austin. Inevitable, it also produced the largest acid rock scene outside of San Francisco, driven by the legendary 13th Floor Elevators. And even the far more well known San Fran scene owed a huge debt to their Texan counterparts. Further, the Austin scene would later have a tremendous influence on a host of other styles: blues rock, punk, new wave, and post-punk, among others. Much more information on the Austin scene can be found in my series on the Elevators.

This was quite a feat for what was and still is one of the most conservative states in these United States. And with a man like McLendon looming behind these happenings, one is left with the distinction impression that these developments were not entirely organic. And with that I shall sign off for now. Until next time dear readers, stay tuned.


Programming Notes

$
0
0


For those of you keeping track, its been a bit of a VISUP media blitz for the past few weeks. Earlier this particular week I was back on We've Read the Documents with the great John Brisson. We had a great discussion that began with the Mellon family and then branched off into several other fascinating topics. It can be found here.

Elsewhere, things are really starting to heat up on The Farm, my official podcast with Frank Zero and Jeremy Knight. We were not able to post podcasts for a few weeks there due to technical issues, but kept recording them anyway. Fortunately, we seem to be past that and have posted a slew of interviews we had in the can in addition to some more recently recorded material. Interviews currently available include:

  • Just myself and the great Christopher Knowles of The Secret Sun discussing Chris' brilliant debut novel He Will Live Up in the Sky. Podcast can be found here.
  • Frank, Knowles, Colin Reid, and myself have an epic discussion loosely related to the similarities to Appalachia and Scotland, with a special emphasis on Indian and Fairy mounds, the feyley lines, and the bizarre, mystical heritage of the Scots-Irish in both the Old Country and North America. That one can be found here.
  • Frank, the great Jasun Horsley of Auticulture, and myself discussing Manson, Holyweird, and a host of other parapolitical and metaphysical topics. Check for that one here
  • Frank, Knowles, and myself discussing the ancient aliens zeitgeist present throughout both incarnations of Doctor Who.
  • The most recent, featuring just Frank and myself discussing the synchromystical classic Hellier and all of the bizarre synchs we've both had both while viewing it and afterwards. 

Be sure to check them and please subscribe to our channel and like the episodes. While there were a few weeks delay there, we should now be having new podcasts posted practically every week.


For more information on some of the topics discussed in these podcasts, check out the following posts/series:

The House of Mellon series
Part one
Part two
Part three
Part four
Part five

The New World? (deals with Indian Mounds and the curiosities of Appalachia)

Man's Son
Part one
Part two

Man's Son or the Children of the Son

As always, I hope everyone enjoys. Apologies for the lack of new material on the blog of late, but be assured I'm hard at work. My debut book will hopefully be out in the coming weeks while I've already made a good dent on my second book. It will deal with the network that spawned Jeffrey Epstein and will be called A Special Relationship. I'm doing everything I can to have it ready for publication in time for the 2020 US presidential elections, which will probably effect that amount of material I'm able to post here in the coming months. Apologies again, but I think all of you will agree that the Epstein book was worth it when it finally drops.

Of course, there are the weekly podcasts to tide you all over in the meantime. And once my debut book drops in the coming weeks, there will be some other projects unveiled to work in conjunction with it. Please be patient and subscribe to the Youtube channel. I promise dear readers that your patience and support will be rewarded in the coming weeks and months as some of these projects come to fruition. Until then, stay tuned until next time.   


The Child Mysteries Part I

$
0
0


In recent years, this researcher has become obsessed with the haunting collecting of traditional English and Scottish ballads collected by Francis James Child during the mid-to-late nineteenth century. Child was both a graduate of, and later professor at, Harvard University. This was quite an accomplishment for a man like Child, who hailed from a firmly working class background, in the nineteenth century. As such, it is hardly surprising that Child was something of Renaissance Man, reportedly being as equally talented as a mathematician, historian, and folklorist.

While nowadays we tend to think of ballads as being sappy love songs, a ballad in a traditional sense is simply a song that tells a story. This is especially true of the songs collected by Child. However, the collection that he assembled, commonly referred to as "Child Ballads," is quite esoteric and occultic.

This fact is probably lost on most American, however, as they are principally familiar with Child Ballads via a very specific type: the murder ballad. Murder ballads have been a staple in these United States since at least the nineteenth century, originally in folk, and later in both blues and country. This traditional was later translated into rock 'n' roll, ensuring its survival into the twenty-first century. In 1996, the Australian musician Nick Cave released a collection such songs in the aptly named Murder Ballads, which at the time became Cave's biggest commercial hit in the States. One of the songs, "Henry Lee," had its origins in the Child Ballad "Young Hunting" (Child 68). Elsewhere, many others are written in the style of a classic, Child-derived murder ballad.


The American obsession with murder ballads is indicative of the more literal and exoteric approach to this type of material, which stands in stark contrast to their roots in the British Isles. Most Child Ballads, including many of the murder-centric ones, are quite mythologically inclined. Ghosts, the fay, witches, and magic are all common staples, as are King Arthur and Robin Hood. Indeed, almost half of the ballads in the third volume of Child's magnum opus The English and Scottish Popular Ballads revolve around Robin Hood. By contrast, many of the more popular Child Ballads in these United States tend to be concerned with more sordid and "mundane" acts such as extramarital affairs and murder.

Ballads Weird and Wonderful

Child's decision to focus on more mystically-inclined ballads may have been influenced in part by his friendship with the Brothers Grimm. Certainly he makes extensive use of the brothers' research to trace the mythological origins of many of the ballads included in The English and Scottish Popular Ballads. As should come as little surprise to regular readers of this blog (or The Secret Sun), the bulk of the Child Ballads involving "Otherwordly" beings (which is the principal focus on this particular article) have an origin in the Nordic countries and/or Scotland:
"In one important particular the balladries of Northern Europe differ from those elsewhere on the continent; the ballad traditions of the Nordic countries and Britain, especially Scotland, are distinguished by the relative prominence of their supernatural ballads. The prominence generally declined in the anglophone tradition transplanted to North America, although certain groups of ballads retained a strength in societies where they continued to fulfill certain socio-cultural functions for their audiences, such as revenant ballads in Newfoundland. In British balladry the supernatural ballads constitute one of the three major subgernes, one of  itself comprises six minigenres, among them the ballads of Otherworld beings.
"Although some versions have been recorded in North America and one or two in England, this minigenre, as recorded, is preponderantly Scottish, which serves to underline the specifically Scottish-Nordic linkage in supernatural balladry..."
(The Good People, "Ballads of Other World Beings," David Buchan, pg. 142)
the Brothers Grimm
Curiously, despite the Celtic Revival (including a reassessment of the so-called "Fairy Faith") that emerged in the UK and US throughout the late nineteenth century and continued well into the early twentieth, the Child Ballads were largely over looked. This, despite the fact that The English and Scottish Popular Ballads being published right in the midst of it. It was not until the 1960s that the Child Ballad's began to wield a wider influence outside of certain select circles. It began with the Celtic folk revival of that decade, spearheaded by singer-songwriters such as Martin Carthy and Shirley Collins. From there, it spread into the broader rock scene via electric folk acts such as Fairport Convention and Pentangle. In more recent years, experimental folk artists such as Current 93 and Blood Axis have continued to explore the most mystical Child Ballads.

Elsewhere, no less an authority than the Nobel Prize-nominated novelist and poet Robert Graves would attempt to incorporate the most Otherwordly of Child's ballads into a neo-Paganism, especially in regards to Wicca and neo-Druidism. Graves' nonfiction work The White Goddess proved to be deeply influential on the pagan revival of the second half of the twentieth century. Peter Levenda describes it as "a canonical text of the European and American witchcraft revival of the 1970s, a book not read so much as handled like a talisman by devotees of the Wicca movement" in the first volume of his classic Sinister Forces trilogy (pg. 91). It was here that Graves would first incorporate the more Otherworldly Child Ballads (as well as the Robin Hood ones) into the emerging neo-pagan zeitgeist. He would later expand upon these notions in his 1957 work The English and Scottish Ballads, in which he would ascribe quite a spiritual importance to certain Child Ballads:
"The world of folk songs and ballads is a savage and mysterious one; indeed, a great many of them, though disguised in Christian dress, belong originally to the ancient pagan witch cult – or 'Old Religion' – which fought a losing battle with Christianity until finally suppressed at the beginning of the eighteenth century. The witches, who were organized by covens, or groups of thirteen, would meet in wild places for their 'Sabbaths', for worship, dancing and merrymaking. Shakespeare, in Macbeth and The Tempest, shows only the black side of the Old Religion: the witches' use of magic to blight crops, cause miscarriages, kill cattle and people, and raise contrary winds. He did this because James I, then on the throne, lived in terror of the Scottish witches who, at the instigation of his political enemies, had made several attempts to poison him, and whose mass-trials he had attended in person..."
(pg. viii) 

Graves was even more implicit in linking various Child Ballads to the "Old Religion" or Witch Cult in The White Goddess, which appears to have believed served as the basis of modern Wicca and other types of European neo-paganism. However, how much of a basis these practices have in the ancient world has been hotly debated for years now. In his examination of the history of Wicca in The Roots of Magick 1700 thru 2000 occultist Allen Greenfield concluded that these claims were tenuous at best.
"... Some form of intact quasi pagan folk beliefs did survive through this period; even as late as the High Middle Ages it survived among the Vikings of Northern Europe. Human sacrifice was practiced at Old Uppsala well into the High Middle Ages. However, the historical record in Europe and later in the Americas generally suggests that, once Christian missionaries began to proselytize in a given area, conversion was astonishingly rapid and pagan beliefs and even most customs rapidly faded. In more recent times, the total conversion in a single generation documented in Mexico and Peru following the Spanish conquest provides substantial proof of the thoroughness of this process... Of course some customs and folklore from paleopagan times exist worldwide, but there has never been any evidence of a link to modern Wicca, other than a literary one..."
(The Roots of Magick 1700 thru 2000, Allen Greenfield, pgs. 124-125)
The antiquity of the Child Ballads is every bit as problematic as that of Wicca. Naturally, Graves believed that they had an origin dating back to at least the Middle Ages, if not earlier:
"... These ballads are ascribed to no author; many exist in several different versions; their tunes are almost always in a haunting minor key; they are clearly not the work of either court poets or townsman; humor is rare; they preach no sermon or political message; they appeal to the heart rather than to the head; most of them concern the twin themes of love and death; and the stories are cut down to the bare bones, with a careful avoidance of rhetoric....
At one time these ballads were the stock-in-trade of, but not necessarily composed by, strolling minstrel such as Sir Walter Scott celebrated... These minstrels – the word ministralis means a dependent – were first kept by great landlords for the entertainment of their households; but the War of the Roses, and other troubles, must have sent many of them out to seek their fortunes with harp or viol in the countryside. Some ballads are complete in themselves; some only fragments..." 
(English & Scottish Ballads, Robert Graves, pg. xiv) 
Robert Graves
However, most Child Ballads can not be reliably dated as being any older than the sixteenth century. Most were not even written down prior to the eighteenth century. This does not preclude these ballads from having existed in the oral tradition prior to this time frame, but it does stretch credibility a bit to suggest that they were around for hundreds of years with little to known documentation prior to the Renaissance.

And then there is the question of the authorship. As Graves indicates above, there is much uncertainty in that regard. Graves attributes these ballads to minstrelsbardstroubadours, and the like. In more recent years, its become popular to attribute many of the Child Ballads to simply "the people," i.e. the common folk. As to the latter, this is likely the case with more crass compositions such as "Hughie Graham" (Child 191) and the like.


But what of the "high" Child Ballad, especially the Otherwordly Scottish ones? "King Orfeo" (Child 19) is, for instance, an adaption of the myth of Orpheus that also incorporates fairy lore. And then there are "Thomas the Rhymer" (Child 37) and "Tam Lin" (Child 39), the epic compositions that arguably spawned the entire mythos around the Queen of Elphame (aka, the Fairy Queen). There is simply no way a farmer or tradesman could have come up with these compositions during this time frame.

Is Graves correct then in suggesting that these more esoteric tracks were the work of minstrels and bards? Quite possibly, but as with many things, the reality seems to be far more complex and stranger. A crucial source for many of the more mysterious Scottish ballads was a certain "Mrs. Brown of Falkland," who was in fact a minister's wife named Anna Gordon


Mrs. Brown of Falkland and Clan Fraser of Lovat

Child noted that "no Scottish ballads are superior in kind to those recited in the last century..." (The English and Scottish Popular Ballads Volume I, pg. vii) than those of Mrs. Gordon. In particular, Anna Gordon appears to have been quite knowledgeable of the most Otherworldly and supernatural of these ballads. Child was especially indebted to her version of "Thomas the Rhymer" while her versions of "Willie's Lady" (Child 6) and "Clerk Colvill" (Child 42) were among the only the Harvard professor was able to uncover.  

But where did Gordon learn the songs? She alleged that she had heard them as a child via her mother, her aunt, and an unidentified nursemaid, among others. However, her father claimed to have never heard many of the songs in his life. What's more, while Gordon is often depicted as being from more humble origins, her father was a professor at what is now the University of Aberdeen and appears to have been chummy with some rather prestigious Scots families. In other words, she came from a solidly middle class background, which in this era implied servants and the like. No doubt she was well educated for a woman from this era as well. Thus, it is unlikely that her songs have much working class pedigree, unless it comes from the unnamed nursemaid.


It was her father, Thomas Gordon, who would do much to promote her ballads. They eventually reached the general public during the early nineteenth century via the likes of Robert Jamieson and Sir Walter Scott, both of whom made extensive use of her collection for popular works they would publish on Scottish ballads. The interests her ballads generated among such circles was principally due to a close friend of her father's: William Tytler. Tytler was apparently the first man who had Gordon's ballads written down and copies of his manuscripts would eventually find there way to men such as Jamieson and Scott. Thus, Tytler was instrumental in bringing her ballads to the public at large.

William Tytler
Tytler was a co-founder of the Royal Society of Edinburgh and a part of the revered Scottish Enlightenment. But beyond this, his efforts would be instrumental in crafting the Celtic Revival. His family would continue these efforts, beginning with his son: Alexander Fraser Tytler, Lord Woodhouselee.

As best as this researcher can tell, Lord Woodhouselee was not born with any Fraser ancestry (at least not for a great many generations), but he did marry into a certain branch of Clan Fraser. Whether he adopted the Fraser name from his wife is unknown, but she did certainly have quite a storied line. Ann Fraser was a distant descendant of Hugh Fraser, 1st Lord Of Lovat via his third son, Alexander Fraser, 1st of Farraline. As regular readers of this blog are well aware, Recluse is quite obsessed with Clan Fraser, and especially the Lovat branch. As I noted before here, this family played a crucial role in crafting modern special operations forces and in addition to numerous other intrigues over the centuries. As such, it wasn't entirely unsurprising to find Clan Fraser of Lovat lurking in the Child Mysteries, but I had not expected in such a bizarre fashion.

Ann Fraser
To wit, Lord Woolhouselee came into possession of a certain castle called Aldourie via his in-laws. Anne Fraser's father, William, had been an officer in the Bengal Army of the East India Company (i.e. a mercenary, a tradition more recent members of Clan Fraser of Lovat would carry on) and later a Deputy-Sheriff of Inverness. His grandson, William Fraser Tytler (who ended up with Aldourie) would also serve as a Sheriff of Inverness Naturally, many of William Fraser Tytler's sons would also sign up for the East India Company's army. One of them, Charles Edward Fraser Tytler, ended up with the castle and sire a daughter named Mary Fraser Tytler.

She would later become Mary Seton Fraser Watts upon her marriage (she wed famed painter George Frederic Watts) and a leading figure in the Celtic Revival. A symbolist craftswoman,  she co-founded the Compton Potters' Artists Guild. The genesis of this outfit produced the Watts Cemetery Chapel, a noteworthy example of Celtic Revival architecture that Mary designed.

Mary Seton Fraser Watts
It just so happens, Mary Seton Fraser Watts also became one of Francis Child's crucial sources for Anna Gordon's ballads. In the intervening years from when William Tytler and his son began to collect them, Aldourie became a repository for these weird ballads. In addition to "Thomas the Rhymer," "Willie's Lady" (featuring a witch and instructions on how to cast a magic spell), and "Clerk Colvill" (featuring a mermaid), other weird ballads the Tytler Fraser family collected from Gordon include: "The Twa Sisters" (Child 10, a supernatural murder ballad), "King Henry (Child 32, which features a witch), "Kemp Owyne (Child 34, another song with magic and witchcraft),  and "Allison Cross" (Child 34, which features both a witch and the Queen of Elphame). Certainly the family seems to have had keen interest in more supernatural-leaning balladry.

However, as the years went on many of these ballads became lost, especially those initially collected by William Tytler. Despite this, Child became convinced that Aldourie contained many of Gordon's most elusive ballads and Watts was more than happy to make periodic pilgrimages to the family seat in search of the lost manuscripts. She was never able to find the originals compiled by William Tytler (these did not turn up at Aldourie until the twentieth century) but she did find several copies of two especially rare ballads, "Willie's Lady" and "Clerk Covill."

The Thelemic Mecca

Stranger still is the location of Aldourie: right off of Loch Ness. What's more, its only a little over 12 miles from Boleskine House. As I'm sure regular readers of this blog are well aware, Boleskine has quite a sinister history. Like Aldourie, Boleskine was also owned by members of Clan Fraser of Lovat until until the last few years of the nineteenth century. It was at this point that it was sold to its most notorious resident: Aleister Crowley.

When Crowley procured Boleskine from Clan Fraser of Lovat, he had ambitious plans for the former hunting lodge. Using rituals found in the grimoire known as The Book of Abramelin, Crowley intended to use Boleskine as the site for his summoning of his Holy Guardian Angel. Crowley had, in theory, selected Boleskine for this ritual due to its seclusion. It was to be a painstaking process that lasted for some six months. The film A Dark Song, one of the best ever depictions of ceremonial magic in cinema, was likely inspired by this particular working.


While Crowley performed the ritual at Boleskine, strange things began to happen. Crowley reported that his lodgekeeper went mad and tried to murder his wife and children, another general laborer he had hired attempted to kill Crowley himself, and a local butcher cut off his own hand while trying to read a note the Great Beast had written. Eventually, Crowley abandoned the ritual before its completion, but not due to any of these strange happenings. Rather, he had to return to London to deal with a quasi-civil war that had broken out among the Golden Dawn.

As such, Crowley never completed the ritual. Despite this, he regarded Boleskine as the "kiblah," the holiest of shrines in Thelema. The rituals of both the Gnostic Mass and the Ritual of the Mark of the Beast require the principal orientation to be towards Boleskine. In other words, it is the Mecca of Thelema. And it is right in the midst of lands owned by various branches of Clan Fraser of Lovat. And then there's Aldourie, repository of some many weird ballads.

Boleskine
As I'm sure many of you are aware, there has been much dispute for years now concerning Aleister Crowley's role in the creation of modern Wicca. Gerald Gardner, the man who popularized Wicca, was a friends of Crowley's and involved with the OTO for a time. Allen Greenfield, who has spent years trying to discern the true origins of Wicca, concluded:
"The question of intent looms in he background of this inquiry. If I had to guess, I would venture that Gerald Gardner did, in fact, invent Wicca more or less whole cloth, to be a popularized version of the OTO. Crowley, and his immediate successor Karl Germer, who also knew Dr. Gardner, likely set 'old Gerald on what they intended to be a Thelmic path, aimed at reestablishing at least a basic OTO encampment in England."
(The Roots of Magick 1700 thru 2000, Allen H. Greenfield, pg. 155)
Gerald Gardner
The reader will recall that Robert Graves would go on to use the more supernaturally-oriented Scottish ballads to argue for an ancient origin to Wicca and other neo-pagan practices that grew out of it. Crowley of course kept a residence a little over 12 miles from one of the most significant repositories of weird ballads. Is it possible Crowley encountered the Fraser Tytler family's collection while residing at Boleskine, and later passed on some of this mythos to Gardner? While William Tytler's original manuscript was lost during this time, there were clearly other copies floating around the castle. If Crowley did encounter several of these manuscripts, does this potentially give modern Wicca more of an ancient origin that what is believed?

While many of the Child ballads themselves can only be reliably dated to about eighteenth century, both "Thomas the Rhymer" and "Tam Lin" have somewhat older pedigree. The latter can be traced back to at least the sixteenth century while the former grew out of a very similar Medieval Romance than can be traced back to the late fourteenth or early fifteenth centuries. Do they then represent a genuine serving fragment of the "fairy faith" of the Middle Ages, which was later preserved in ballad form? In the case of "Thomas the Rhymer," the ballad version may not have appeared until 1700, indicating a more recent attempt to not preserve, but revive the old ways.

It is thus likely that these types of ballads were the result of learned men and not "the people," men interested in preserving the old ways at a time when the modern age threatened to wipe out the last vestiges of the fairy faith. Thus, folklore was translated into balladry, where it then reentered the public consciousness. As such, it is not surprising that a branch of Clan Fraser of Lovat would become such keen collectors. What's more, they are exactly the type of family that would have sponsored the creation of such ballads in the first place. This is highly speculative on my part, but clearly these ballads came from somewhere, and their Celtic-Nordic pedigree is in keep with both Clan Fraser and many of the other Scots lords (the Nordic origins of various clans was addressed before here). Clan Fraser of Lovat clearly did their part in both preserving and reviving these ballads (remember that Mary Seton Fraser Watts was a leading figure in the Celtic Revival). It hardly seems a stretch that this mysterious family played a role in their origins as well.

And with that, I shall sign off for now. The next installment will breakdown several of the most noteworthy supernatural ballads. For those of you looking for more details concerning this article's information, check out this recent podcast I did with Christopher Knowles of the Secret Sun discussing Clan Fraser of Lovat, Scottish ballads, and a host of other related topics:


Hail to the Chiefs

$
0
0


One of Recluse's guiltiest pleasures is NFL football. Having grown up in a small town in West Virginia, I was initiated into the cultish world of football at a young age. For those of you who did not grow up in the American South or Midwest, especially before the twenty-first century, it is difficult to grasp what a big part of life football is in those regions of the country. Everything from the pee wee teams, on up through the high school and college ranks, and concluding with the NFL, is a cultural staple across any number of forgotten towns in the Fly-Over States.

In all honesty, I should have given up on the sport years ago, probably around the time I realized it was completely under the dominion of the Syndicate. But old habits die hard, and this most recent Super Bowl was especially curious to me. As a young lad growing up in the 1980s, I idolized Joe Montana. As such, I rooted for the 49ers, or at least until Montana was traded to the Kansas City Chiefs. From there, my allegiance shifted to KC and it remained there even after Montana retired following the '94 season.

It probably goes without saying, but I was intrigued by seeing my two favorite childhood teams squaring off against one another in what some have dubbed the "Montana Bowl." And having followed KC for several decades, there was a part of me rejoicing that the team had made it back to its first Super Bowl in 50 years. Certainly I've experienced some heartbreaking playoff loses with this franchise over the years, to put it mildly.

Joe Montana, in both incarnations
But upon Kansas City's 31-20 victory over San Fran or 2/2/20, it occurs to me that it is time to give up childish things and face reality. And the reality is that the Hunt family of Texas, founders and longtime owners of the Kansas City Chiefs, have ravaged this nation for decades.

It all began with family patriarch H.L. Hunt, whose extended family would serve as the basis for the long running TV series Dallas. Old Man Hunt was a self-professed "professional gambler" who used his winnings from poker to first break into the oil industry during the 1920s. By the 1940s, his now-extensive oil holdings had made him one of the richest men in both the nation and the world.

During the Cold War, Old Man Hunt became a radical anti-Communist. In his classic The Man Who Knew Too Much, Dick Russel would refer to H.L. and his far right Life Line media outlet as one of the two "leading media propagandists" (pg. 191) in the budding anti-Communist crusade. Life Line broadcasts were carried over four hundred radio stations across forty-two states by the early 1960s. It helped lay the stage for the Rush Limbaugh-derived talk radio culture that began to emerge during the 1980s. For this reason, Russell singled out Hunt as a leading figure in the rise of the Cold War-era far right and he is hardly alone in this assessment. Even before modern-era Democratic bugaboos like the Koch family entered the arena, the Hunt family was hard at work subsidizing the far right.

H.L. Hunt
But beyond that, it does not appear the Old Man Hunt's ties to the Syndicate ever ended. Indeed, he seems to have picked up even more unsavory connections over the years, many of them linked to the FBI and Army intelligence. A far amount of these connections would later appear in the JFK assassination, as was noted before here.

The Next Generation

H.L. Hunt had many wives (at times carrying on a bigamous existence) and mistresses. As such, he also had many children. And many of them have carried on the old man's legacy of far right activism. 

None better personifies this passing of the torch than Nelson Bunker Hunt. Along time darling of the far right, Bunker and several of his brothers are most well remembered for attempting to corner the world silver market during the late 1970s. "Former" Naval intelligence officer and disinformation agent William Milton Cooper once glowingly wrote of Bunker and company:
"Jonathan May attempted to free us from the shackles of the Federal Reserve by creating an alternative banking system with instruments backed by land, raw materials, mineral deposits, oil, coal, timber, and other wilderness holdings. Jonathan aided Governor Connolly and the Hunt brothers in their effort to corner the silver market. The silver would have been used to create a 'Bank of Texas' issue of 'real' money. This would have destroyed the Federal Reserve had the Hunts been successful. When the world bankers realized what was happening, they destroyed Connolly, the Hunt brothers, Jonathan May, and Texas." 
(Behold a Pale Horse, pg. 333)
the legendary (and infamous) William Milton Cooper
In theory, this plot was quashed by the evil United States government to preserve the Federal Reserve system. In the process the Hunt brother, but most notably Bunker, were bankrupted. Indeed, Bunker and brother William Herbert filed two of the largest personal bankruptcies ever in 1988. Officially, Bunker's fortune never recovered (brother William Herbert is once again a billionaire, however). And yet his life style changed little. He would continue to indulge in his passion for thoroughbred racing up until his death in 2014 in addition to generously sponsoring various right wing causes. Consider, for instance, the founding of the Council for National Policy (CNP):
"The CNP was founded in 1981 when Tim LaHaye, a leader of Moral Majority, proposed the idea to wealthy Texan T. Cullen Davis. Davis contacted billionaire Nelson Bunker Hunt, and from that point on they began recruiting members. By 1984, the Council had four hundred members."
(The Coors Connection, Russ Bellant, pgs. 36-37)
In the years since Bunker helped set up the CNP, it has become a powerhouse among the right, functioning as something akin to their own Council on Foreign Relations:
"...the secretive Council for National Policy, described by the New York Times as a little-known club of a few hundred of the most powerful conservatives in the country [which has] met behind closed doors at undisclosed locations for a confidential conference' three times a year 'to strategize about how to turn the country to the right.' The Council was started in 1981 by Rev. Tim LaHaye, one of the founders of the modern right-wing Christian movement in the United States and author of the apocalyptic Left Behind novels. The idea was to build a Christian conservative alternative to the Council on Foreign Relations, which LaHaye considered too liberal. CNP membership is kept secret, members are instructed that 'The media should not know when or where we meet or who takes part in our programs, before after a meeting.'..."
(Backwater: The Rise of the World's Most Powerful Mercenary Army, Jeremy Scahill, pg. 80)
In the era of Trump, the CNP has gained unprecedented power. But the CNP is hardly the extent of Bunker Hunt's legacy of right wing activism. For years, he was also a leading figure in the John Birch Society (JBS), eventually joining the outfit's national council. Much of Alex Jones' ideology has been adopted wholesale from the JBS, sans a few tweaks.


Its not just the exclusive and fringe right that the Hunt family has guided, however. During the Bush II years, they gained considerable influence over the presidency itself. Ray Lee Hunt, H.L.'s youngest son, was a board member of Halliburton and a longtime friend of the Bush family. Bush the Lesser made Ray a member of the power President's Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board and conspired to get him a sweetheart deal for Kurdistan's oil, while undermining the Iraqi government in the process. Ray returned the favor by providing Southern Methodist University (which Ray, W., and numerous members of both the Hunt and Bush families have attended) with a cool $35 million to procure land for Bush II's presidential library. Presently Ray Lee is a member of board of trustees of the uber spooked-up Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), another right wing think tank that has gained considerable influence during the Trump years.

Ray Lee Hunt
And then there is Lamar Hunt. Lamar was involved in the efforts of Bunker and Herbert to corner the world silver market, but he is most well known for his contributions to American sports. In addition to founding the Kansas City Chiefs, he also co-founded the American Football League (which merged with the National Football Conference in 1966 to create the modern NFL), World Championship Tennis, and Major League Soccer.

Indeed, Lamar Hunt appears to have gone to great lengths to publicly avoid the political extremism of several of his brothers. His bios are generally squeaky clean, focusing exclusively on his relation to the sport's world. There is good reason for this, as many football fans would probably not want to read antidotes such as this:
"More alarming was the Warren Commission's finding that on the day before the assassination, Jack Ruby had driven a young woman over to the Hunt offices for a job interview. After Ruby shot Oswald, Dallas police found two scripts from H. L. Hunt's Life Line radio program among his possessions. The FBI also reported that the telephone number of another son, Lamar, appeared in a book which was the property of Jack Ruby. Questioned about this on December 17, 1963, Lamar replied 'that he could not think of any reason why his name would appear in Jack Ruby's personal property and that he had no contact whatsoever with Ruby to the best of his knowledge.' "
(The Man Who Knew Too Much, Dick Russell, pgs. 587-588)
Jack Ruby
Lamar's denials are especially disingenuous as the FBI was also aware of the fact that it was Lamar's offices that Ruby had visited on the day before the assassination. But the longtime Chiefs' owner had good reason to deny associations with Oswald' assassin. Besides being deeply implicated in the Kennedy assassination as well, Jack Ruby was also a leading organized crime figure in the Dallas area (recently noted here). Such a connection would have no doubt proved to be deeply embarrassing to such a leading figure in sports as Lamar Hunt.

Lamar shed his mortal coil in 2006, paving the way for son Clark Hunt to take control of the franchise. So far, Clark has done a better job of covering potential ties to organized crime, but the Chiefs franchise has endured its share of controversy in the nearly 15 years since he took over for his father. Most notably, this has been a persistent trend of domestic violence among KC's players. The most notorious incident of this by far was the tragic murder/suicide involving former Chiefs linebacker Jovan Belcher in 2012. As I noted before at the time of Belcher's breakdown, there were rumblings that the high tension atmosphere Clark Hunt had brought to KC upon his father's death may have contributed to the tragedy. Bizarrely, current-Chiefs head coach Andy Reid also lost his son to suicide the year before signing on with Kansas City.

Clark Hunt
Still, there have been indications that Clark is a chip off the old block. Just this past spring, Clark settled a "pay-to-play" lawsuit brought about by the state of New Mexico initially in 2017. Hunt was accused of providing kickbacks to then-Governor Bill Richardson for hundreds of millions in state funding. This is especially ominous in light of the close ties both Richardson and the state of New Mexico  have to Jeffrey Epstein, though Clark seems to have avoided direct ties to the pedo financier.

Regardless, the legacy of organized crime should always linger over the Hunt family, especially Lamar's wing. But Lamar Hunt's Syndicate ties were hardly an exception among early NFL owners. Fellow Texan and then-Dallas Cowboys owner Clint Murchison Jr. traveled in many of the same mobbed-up circles in Dallas, for instance. All of this paints a rather unsavory picture, namely that America's Sport is also the Mob's Sport. Indeed, when all is said and done, the modern NFL is as much the Syndicate's legacy as anyone's.

But in the era of Trump, perhaps the same could be said of American politics and even society on the whole. It is a sad situation all around dear reader, and on that note I shall wrap things up for now. Until next time, stay tuned.


Checking in on the Farm

$
0
0

For those of you craving more VISUP content, be sure to keep an eye on The Farm, my official podcast with ZeroKnight. During the last three weeks alone, I've hosted or co-hosted some real barnburners. 

Most recently, I sat down with the great Jasun Horseley of Auticulture to launch what will be an ongoing series exploring the history of secret societies and chivalric orders and their ongoing influence on the world today. I'm calling it the Anti-Mystery Babylon as I'm trying to dramatically raise the bar for this type of research beyond what "former" Office of Naval Intelligence man William Milton Cooper managed all those years ago. 


Needless to say, I'm very excited about this podcast and the ones that will follow it in this particular series. Eventually, I'm going to start dipping into my collection of personal papers and reveal information that has never been made public (to the best of my knowledge). Certainly keep an eye on this one. 

Bu there's more! The week before, Frank Zero and I held a wide reaching discussion with Somerset, KY's Penny Royal crew. For those of you who have been watching the series Hellier (and if you haven't been watching it, you really should as its a synch goldmine), two Penny Royal members (Nathan Paul Issac and Kyle Kadel) appear in the eighth episode of the second season of that series. It probably goes without saying, but we discuss Hellier in addition to a host of other topics, most notably the bizarre nexus of high weirdness, organized crime, paramilitary activities, and cults that have proliferated in Kentucky since at least the early 1970s and which linger like a specter across the infamous 2016 US Presidential election


Much more information on Trump's ties to this bizarre nexus can be found here and here.

Finally, I was able to cross off one of my bucket lists items a few weeks ago when I was able to sit down with the great Christopher Knowles of The Secret Sun to talk some Blue Oyster Cult!


If that seems a little dull, keep in mind that we were using BOC's music as a stepping stone for understanding all of the insane high weirdness playing out in Long Island during this time. There's ample discussion here about cults, secret armies, alien gods, mind control, and other closely related tropes. Was famed BOC producer, manager, and frequent songwriter Sandy Pearlman telling some serious tales out of school? Listen in, read my epic series on BOC, and decide for yourselves. 

And with that, I shall sign off for now dear readers. Sorry again for the lack of content of late on the blog, but the podcast is going strong and I'm making some good headway on my Epstein book, A Special Relationship, while the finishing touches are being put on my debut book. There will hopefully be some exciting announcements in that regard coming soon. Until then dear reader, stay tuned. 


The Synarchist Mysteries of the OTS

$
0
0


I was privileged to have the great Christopher Knowles of the Secret Sun back on The Farm this week. This also happened to be the second installment in my ongoing examination of secret societies that I'm calling the Anti-Mystery Babylon. The first installment was launched last week with Jasun Horsely of Auticulture. But whereas the discussion with Jasun was a more general one on secret societies, Knowles and I had a very specific target in mind with this podcast: the infamous Order of the Solar Temple (OTS). The OTS was one of the big four of millennium cults from the 1990s, along with Heaven's GateAum Shinrikyo, and the Branch Davidians.

We used the OTS as a launching point for an epic discussion concerning the history of chivalric orders and legions upon legions of secret societies. This chat is highly recommended:


Here, I would like to provide some supplementals and documentation to our discussion. In order to fully grok what was going on with the Order of the Solar Temple, we need first consider the curious background of one of its leading figures, the Belgian Luc Jouret. I've already dealt a bit with Jouret and the OTS before here, but a few crucial points bear repeating:

First and foremost, Jouret is not what he seems. He is typically depicted as having a longstanding interest in Communism. Reportedly, he had had dealings with something called the "Walloon Communist Youth" during his late teens and early 20s in Belgian. Later, during his time in the Belgian Army, he declared that he would help "communism to clean out the army."

However, Jouret was not a rank and file military man, but a paratrooper who participated in the 1978 Battle of Kolwezi. Paratroopers are typically elite forces in general, at it would seem that Belgian paratroopers active at Kolwezi were a part of what then known as Para-Commando Brigade, which dealt in special operations. Jouret was thus most likely a special operator. Would Belgian authorities have allowed a man with known Communist sympathies since being a teenager into such an elite unit, one involved in a host of classified operations, during the height of the Cold War? 

Jouret
This does not seem especially likely. A more probable scenario is that Jouret was allowed into Belgium's special operations forces due to work he had carried out earlier in the decade. Specifically, I'm referring to his alleged role in founding the Parti Communautaire Européen (PCE), a pan-European Nationalist party sporting an ideology similar to "National Bolshevism."

Throughout the Cold War, Belgium featured an especially strong Communist party. During the 1960s, there was a real fear that the Communist Party of Belgium (PCB) may prevail at the elections. Thus, the arrival of the PCE was quite fortuitous, and there was been much speculation that it was used to split the Communist vote and preserve the status quo.


Thiriart: International Man of Msystery

The man behind the PCE was quite a character, to put it mildly. Jean-Franois Thiriart was a left-leaning fascist activist who worked with the collaborationist Amis du Grand Reich Allemand (AGRA: Friends of the Great German Empire) during the war. He was briefly imprisoned after the war, and this likely curtailed his political activities for years. Thiriart did not become active again until the early 1960s, in the midst of the death throes of European colonialism. It began with the Congo Crisis. Many Belgians, faced with the loss of their most prized colony, rallied to a hastily conceived organization known as Committee for Action and Defense of Belgians in Africa (CADBA).

Thiriart and several of his supporters found CADBA to be too tame and tentative for their liking, and set out to stealthy take it over. After the coup was completed, CADBA transformed into the far more radical Mouvement d'Action Civique (MAC: Civic Action Movement). It established its own youth wing, MAC-Jeunes (MAC Youth), complete with its own uniforms and armbands; and paramilitary wing, which recruited heavily from military veterans. Paratroopers were especially popular, naturally, and the MAC recruited heavily from the Amicale des Parachutistes (Paratrooper Association) and the Club National de Parachutisme (National Parachutist Club). With such recruits, it wasn't long before the MAC established paramilitary training camps and weapons caches. They also staged vigorous political demonstrations, one against JFK in Vienna.

Thiriart
Unlike the CADBA, which was principally concerned with the Belgian struggle in the Congo, the MAC sought to support the colonial struggle across Europe. To this end, they forged close ties with the Organisation armee secrete (OAS: Secret Army Organization).The OAS was a far right, paramilitary network of French military men whom had rebelled against de Gaule in the aftermath of his decision to withdraw from Algeria in 1961. This plunged France into a brutal, covert civil war that saw the OAS pitted against Gaulist forces. This was addressed a bit before here.

The MAC became the OAS's principal agent in Belgium and a key cog in their support network. Jeffrey Bale reports that it was during this time that Thiriart also established ties with infamous Nazi commando Otto Skorzeny, a crucial figure in the postwar Nazi underground (noted before here and here). However, Kevin Coogan notes in Dreamer of the Day that Thiriart boasted of helping Skorzeny "track down British and Jewish terrorists" in occupied France during an interview Coogan conducted with him in 1986. In The Skorzeny Papers, Ralph Ganis also alleges that Thiriart trained with Skorzeny's elite SS forces during the war. Ganis also claims that Thiriart would later work with Skorzeny's postwar mercenaries and was the principal point of contact between the SS commando and interests representing the breakaway Katanga state, a crucial player in the Congo crisis.

Regardless, Thiriart was well connected among far right paramilitary forces by the early 1960s, if not much sooner. During this time Thiriart also forged ties with fellow Belgian Pierre Joly, who had previously been involved with the pan-European, anti-communist Paix et la Liberte network. As was noted before here, there is much evidence Paix was linked to the CIA as well.

a Paix et al Liberte poster
By the mid-1960s, Thiriart had allegedly become disillusioned with the OAS and the more "traditional fascist" groups the MAC had aligned itself with. Many of these organizations were still wedded to nationalism while Thiriart was increasingly moving towards a pan-Europe ideology. What's more, he was dubious of these United States and increasingly saw America representing a greater threat than the Soviet Union. Without ever actually hitching his wagon to the Soviets, Thiriart would seek closer ties with the emerging nationalist movements in the developing world as the decade wore on.

This pursuits let to a break with many of the more traditional elements in the MAC, who began to abandon it for more moderate pro-colonial regroups. This led Thiriart to re brand the outfit yet again, this time as Juene Europe (JE: Young Europe), in 1962. Soon, JE had branches all across Europe and beyond. Naturally, there was a South African branch, but more intriguing are the ones in Latin America. In the first book of The Darkest Sides of Politics series, Jeffrey Bale noted that these Latin American chapters were called Joven America, and featured chapters in Argentina, Columbia, Uruguay, and Ecuador. There was also one in Brazil, but it does not appear to have been affiliated with the Joven America chapters.

Stefan Possony tells an interesting story about whom established the Joven America branches. During the early 1970s, he was tasked by the World Anti-Communist League (WACL) to investigate a mysterious secret society that had taken over the Latin American branch of that organization. As regular readers of this blog are well aware, WACL was for much of the Cold War the visible face of the Fascist International; knee deep in arms and drug trafficking and terrorism the world over; and awash with secret societies and cults (all of which was noted in this classic series).

As such, its a bit surprising (and dubious) that WACL would be so concerned over Mexico's Los Tecos secret society. Like much of the rest of the League, it was deeply committed to drug trafficking and anti-Communist terrorism (noted before here). Perhaps its fanatical anti-Semitism made some of the League's Israeli backers a trifle nervous? Regardless, the famed technocrat who is often described as the "visionary" behind the Strategic Defense Initiative was dispatched by WACL to investigate. I'm in possession of a copy of that report taken from the Hoover Institute that is available upon request. In this report, Possony describes Los Tecos as being the sponsors behind the Jovan America branches of Jeune Europe.

"Tecos" means "owls"
Curiously, one of Thiriart's former partners in the MAC, Emil Lecref, would go on to become a leading figure in the Belgian wing of WACL (noted before here). In theory, this was around the time Thiriart was making a break from anti-Communist hardliners such as Lecref. Still, this didn't stop Jean-Francois from forging an alliance with the fanatically anti-Communist Los Tecos outfit.

Regardless, Thiriart at least appeared to make a formal break with such groups when he shuttered Jeune Europe in 1965 and replaced it with the Parti Communautaire Européen (PCE) during that same year. And that brings me to one of the major problems with Jouret's association with Thiriart and the PCE: Most accounts claim he became involved during the 1970s, but Thiriart had already shuttered the PCE in 1968. Further muddying the waters is the Parti Communautaire National-Européen, a successor group established in the 1980s with Thiriart's blessing. Its founder and longtime head is named Luc Michel.


Enter Synarchy

Thus, the possibility that some researchers confused Jouret with Michel cannot be discounted. On the other hand, there is a bizarre connection to all of this: synarchy. This doctrine, firmly rooted in the occult, was popularized by Alexandre Saint-Yves d'Alveydre during the late nineteenth century and later incorporated into Martinism by Papus. Synarchy is, in essence, an anti-Democratic doctrine that calls for society to be governed and managed by a kind of technocratic elite.

For years, there have been allegations that synarchy was behind France's defeat by the Nazis and that it was the driving ideology of the secret society often referred to as La Cagoule (officially the Comité secret d'action révolutionnaire). In many ways, the Cagoule were a kind of prototype for the later close collaboration between secret societies and stay-behind armies that appeared throughout the Cold War. The extensive role the Cagoule played in stay-behind efforts during the interwar period was addressed at length before here.


After being broken up and imprisoned by French authorities in 1937, many of the Cagoulards were released during the time of the Nazi invasion. In the aftermath, many stayed on in France as collaborators while some went to work with the Allies. Some of the most militant Cagoulards would be used to establish stay-behinds for the Nazis as it became evident that they would be driven from France.
"During the war, Skorzeny, who was always astute to the political use of special forces, organized a group called 'Organisation Technique' or (OT), to carry out 'a number of independent operations aimed at provoking right-wing resistance in France.' The OT had the mission of creating 'an alliance of anti-Communist.' This effort was to exploit the close bonds of brotherhood that existed between former members of the Cagoule, regardless of who they sided with. In essence, the former Cagoule serving with Skorzeny's command were attempting to establish a dialogue with the former Cagoule serving in the French Resistance and French Army. These men were looking into the future of France and wanted to prevent a communist takeover of the country after the war. They also believed it might provide a 'conduit to the Americans,' thus weakening the Allied partnership the Soviet Russia. Ultimately, this covert effort at the end of the war to rally former Cagoule into a common anti-communists group lies at the heart of the French intelligence contact with Skorzeny.
"After the successful Allied invasion of France in June 1944 and subsequent liberation of Paris in August, thousands of the chief French forces bolted for Germany, where an émigré government set up in southwestern Germany with the exile capital established at Sigmaringen. In October, the OT was created by Joseph Darnand, the former head of the Vichy Milice (French fascist paramilitary), consisting of 150-200 volunteers to be trained as agents and sent back in France to fight the allied forces.
"Command of the OT was given to Jean Degans, a former member of the Cagoule and former director of the Vichy police. OT liaisons with the Germans came from Skorzeny's Jagdverband, and Jean Filliol, a former Cagoule who exercised day-to-day control of the group. Several OT sabotage and secret service camps were established in Germany with training and operational planning coming directly from Skorzeny's special forces."
(The Skorzeny Papers, Ralph P. Ganis, pgs. 59-60) 
As was noted above, Thiriart alleged to have worked with Skorzeny during the war in what Kevin Coogan described as occupied France. Presumably, this is the Nazi occupation Coogan was referring too. The OT obviously didn't emerge until after the Nazis withdrew, but Skorzeny's ties to the old Cagoule network likely didn't begin until after the Germans were forced to withdraw. As such, the possibility that Thiriart came into contact the Cagoule during the war cannot be discounted.

Skorzeny
Ah, but there's more: When Thiriart became politically active again during the early 1960s, he established close ties with the OAS pretty early on. Several former Cagoulards threw their lot in with the OAS, including the mysterious Dr. Henri Martin (ironically, Martin was also the first individual to "expose" the synarchist plot in France, though he did not link it to the Cagoule). Another mysterious Cagoulard who found his way into the OAS underground was Robert Leroy.
"... Robert-Henri Leroy, who had an extraordinarily lengthy career as both a right-wing political activist and a specialist in intelligence and covert operations. He had formerly been a member of Charles Maurras's Action Francaise (French Action), the prewar Cagoule terrorist underground, the Carlist Requete militia forces during the Spanish Civil War, Vichy intelligence, the Waffen-SS's 'Charlemagne' division (with the rank of Hauptsturmfuhrer), and Otto Skorzeny's commando force, for which he served as an instructor. After the war he spent seven years in prison for collaborating with the enemy, then following his release he allegedly went to work for both NATO intelligence and the BND in the period between 1958 and 1968..."
(The Darkest Sides of Politics, I, Jeffrey Bale, pgs. 141-142)
Thus, Leroy also has the Skorzeny connection. This researcher has been unable to determine whether Leroy supported the OAS during their heyday (which would hardly be surprising), but he would certainly be collaborating with veterans of that network by the late 1960s. In 1968, he signed on with the brutal far right outfit known as Aginter Press, which had been founded by the most die-hard OAS veterans. This self-described press agency, which received ample backing from fascist Portugal during its peak years, was a vast, international terror network linked to atrocities on at least three continents. It was one of the most militant fascist organizations during the Cold War and played a crucial role in developing the so-called "strategy of tension," a guiding ideology behind neo-fascists the world over during that era. Much more can be found concerning Aginter here. Naturally, Aginter also maintained close ties with Skorzeny and his network.


By the late 1960s, both Thiriart and Aginter had set their eye upon the Chinese communists. The former allegedly wanted to form an alliance with them while the later sought to penetrate their intelligence operations. Apparently, this was something Thiriart and Aginter deemed that they could collaborate on.
"Thiriart maintained his Maoist ties through his murky dealings with a far -right 'press service'/private intelligence agency, the Portugal-based Aginter Press. Aginter worked with an overtly pro-Chinese political group in Switzerland called the Pati Cmmuniste Suisse/Marxist-Leniniste (PCS/ML). An Aginter operative name Robert Leroy, with support from the Communist Chinese embassy in Berne, arranged for the PCS/ ML to hire Aginter operatives as 'correspondents' for the group's newspaper, L'Etincelle, which was used to gain access to radical groups in Angola, Guinea-Bissau, and Mozambique. The head of the PCS/ML was himself the most likely member of the far right. Thiriart played a liaison role for Aginter, the PCS/ML, and the Chinese embassy."
(Dreamer of the Day, Kevin Coogan, pgs. 544-545)
As such, this certainly raises the question of how serious Thiriart's break with the OAS truly was, as he was clearly collaborating with veterans by the end of the decade again. What's more, his point of contact was a former Cagoulard, Leroy, who had previously worked with Skorzeny during the war. This is also around the time Jouret could have been potentially collaborating with Thiriart in the PCE. 

But wait, there's one final synarchist connection to Thiriart besides the old Cagoule network. This one comes in the form of his Latin America partners in Jeune Europe, Los Tecos. The Tecos potentially had ties to a Mexican synarchist movement dubbed the National Synarchist Union. Like the Tecos, it was a far right Catholic movement that grew out of the Cristero War. These potential connections are very controversial, but not without merit. More information on this topic can be found here.

the banner of the National Synarchist Union
But what is the Order of the Solar Temple connection to synarchy, you maybe asking. Well, the OTS had an inner circle, a kind of secret society with the secret society, which actually ran things. Here are the details:
"... The OTS itself, 'the true secret Templar organization,' which was headed by a Synarchie du Temple (Synarchy of the Temple), composed of influential leaders of the OTS whose identity was secret from outsiders and low level members. Under the Synarchy, a Conseil de l'Ordre (Council of the Order) organized members and to various 'lodges,' and within each lodge the members were in turn divided into a hierarchy of three initiatory levels..."
The Darkest Sides of Politics, II, Jeffrey Bale, pg. 130)
In other words, the inner circle of the OTS described itself as synarchist. Obviously, this could simply be in reference to the most basic definition of synarchy, namely an undemocratic rule by the elite. But given all the former Cagoulists that Thiriart crossed paths with, I suspect the use of synarchy here has a deeper meaning. Certainly, it seems to appear over and over again among Thiriart's associates, which Jouret was reportedly one of.

Of course, many conspiracy theories concerning synarchy depict it as co-opting both the right and the left for its own purposes. Certainly, this appears to be true of the Cagoule in postwar France. In The Sion Revelation, Picknett and Prince make much of socialist Francois Mitterrand's ties to the Cagoule. As I noted before here, the Cagoule appear to have played a crucial role in establishing Le Cercle, the far right's answer to Bilderberg. It probably goes without saying, but Le Cercle wielded tremendous power in the French state for years as well.

Mitterrand
Whether or not this is evidence of a synarchist plot is highly debatable. But what cannot be debated is Knowles' observation that as organizations com and ago, the same individuals keep turning up over and over gain in these types of activities. The Cagoulards are a text book example of this. They went from being a minor paramilitary network in inner-war France to being a major power throughout the Cold War, decades after the Cagoule had officially been dissolved. Regardless whether France was controlled by Nazis, the Catholic right, or even Socialists, the Cagoulards were never far from the centers of power.

Organizations come and again, but the same networks continue, often only dissolving when old age finally catches up with the members. And even then, as the OTS indicates, a way is found at times to preserve their legacy. Nearly 60 years after the Cagoule were surprised, the OTS launched its rampage of suicides and murders. Here we have another bizarre secret society involved in stay-behind efforts and flying the synarchist flag. Surely all of this stretches coincidence dear readers.



The Inevitable COVID-19 Musings

$
0
0


Talking the deep politics of the coronavirus with John Brisson of We've Read the Documents. Check it out:


For those of you looking to avoid the whole COVID-19 thing, checkout the latest installment in Frank Zero's Saturday Morning Vision Quest:


And maybe the great Paul Weston and I discussing Crowley and the Aeon of Horus:


That's about as light as it gets on my end, anyway. As always, I hope you guys enjoy. Sorry for the lack updates, but expect some big announcements in the next couple of days. Until then, stay tuned dear readers.


It Is Happening

$
0
0

Already bored out of your mind due to the pandemic? Are you desperate to find something mentally engaging to do and maybe learn about the world that's coming post-COVID-19? Well, I just may be able to help you with that. Cue shameless plug:

I'm very pleased to finally announce the release of my debut book, Strange Tales of the Parapolitical: Postwar Nazis, Mercenaries, and Other Secret History, co-authored with Frank Zero of ZeroKnight and The Farm podcast (which we both co-host). Here's a synopsis:
"Strange Tales of the Parapolitical is one long, terrifying journey into the black heart of the national security state and beyond. S. William Snider ("Recluse" of the famed VISUP parapolitical blog) and Frank Zero (he of ZeroKnight and co-author of Contact), co-hosts of the cult podcast The Farm, reteam once again for this series of essays. Here you will learn how one of the wealthiest and most powerful families in these United States has molded both the counterculture and the Christian right for decades; about the international reach of the most infamous Nazi colony in South America, to say nothing of the arch child rapist who headed it; the secret history of the modern private military industry and its shocking reach into the Trump administration; and the terrifying implications of the RFID chip. Drawing equal inspiration from the synchro-mysticism  and the scholarly deep political histories of Peter Dale Scott and Jeffrey Bale, Recluse and Zero provide a surreal and haunting road map of how we arrived in the Trump era and where we may go from here."
PDF copies of the book are now available at The Farm's official store website. Right now its available in a two pack bundle with Frank's debut work, CONTACT: Them or Us. If you're looking for something to do during quarantine, there's probably worse ways to spend your time than reading these two great books, now available at a special price for a limited amount of time.


For those of you holding out for the physical copies (I know I would be), they will hopefully be on Amazon by April 10th. With the current state of things, I can't say that's a certainty, but that's what we're aiming for. If you're on the fence, please consider going with the digital copies we're offering. You get two books for less than the cost of a physical copy of Strange Tales... and we get to keep all the profits, rather than splitting them with Amazon.

I know times are tough. But if you've enjoyed the content on this blog over the years, please consider supporting it now that I have something to offer. I've been at this for nearly ten years and have literally invested thousands of dollars into the research presented on this blog. I've only ever made a few hundred bucks off of it over the years.

I'm not complaining. I never expected to make significant money off of this thing. But I've reached a point in my research where, if it is to continue to advance, I need additional funding outside of my own pocket. There are ambitious things I would like to do: combing various archives across the country, conducting in person interviews, potentially making a documentary, etc. But I can't afford to do these things by my lonesome.

I've resisted attempting to do crowdfunding or anything like that. I don't like asking for money unless I have something to offer in return. And now I do. So please, consider picking up a copy of Strange Tales... in whatever form is most appealing to you. As I said, I know times are tough. But not only will Strange Tales... help you pass the time, it will also breakdown the emerging world order. In the private contractors essay alone you will learn about the profound transformation the national security state underwent during the Bush II years, the forces that brought Trump to power as a result, and the now-prophetic Anthrax false flag staged in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 (and likely linked to SAIC). And this is just scratching the surface. There's a lot of great stuff in this book, and while not intended as such, it provides a compelling analysis of the evolution of the national security state from the aftermath of World War II to present day. It will take things you've learned on this blog to the next level.

If you need more convincing, check out these recent podcast I did plugging the book:




Be warned: a epic media blitz is about to unfold for this book. Expect many podcasts in the coming weeks. And with that dear readers, I shall sign off for now. Stay tuned and thank you all so very much for your support.


Viewing all 332 articles
Browse latest View live